On 14 Jan 2014 03:52, Andrew Starks andrew.sta...@trms.com wrote:
On Monday, January 13, 2014, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:37 AM, Andrew Starks andrew.sta...@trms.com
wrote:
I don't have LuaJit installed and would not install it (and migrate
everything I do over
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 4:51 AM, Andrew Starks andrew.sta...@trms.com wrote:
I also just remembered this:
https://github.com/jmckaskill/luaffi
Which is a luajit compatible FFI extension for Lua 5.1 and Lua 5.2, but 5.2
is listed as beta. It might be worth a shot, if it lets you gain some of
* Jason A. Donenfeld:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:10 AM, demetri demetri.spa...@gmail.com wrote:
1) PUC Lua works on more machines/architectures (though Mike has
substantially closed the gap for most architectures people care about in a
non-embedded non-mobile environment)
Do you know what
But perhaps there
are some obvious downsides to this approach that I also am missing.
Here are a few more potential downsides not mentioned so far.
One is that iOS and Windows Store policies disallow JIT. While you can
disable this part in LuaJIT, most of the performance advantages
disappear
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Coda Highland chighl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Eric Wing ewmail...@gmail.com wrote:
But perhaps there
are some obvious downsides to this approach that I also am missing.
Here are a few more potential downsides not mentioned so far.
One more thing for luajit vs. lua - If you ship a plugin (.so, .dll,
.dylib) using luajit, then the host application might not always work
with it. If I'm not mistaken the lower 2GB (or 4GB?) must be allocated
to luajit, (so even in 64-bit app, it needs the lower 32-bit address
space - for lua
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:12 AM, Tim Hill drtimh...@gmail.com wrote:
LuaJIT is currently compatible with Lua 5.1, not 5.2 or the upcoming 5.3, and
my understanding is the LuaJIT project has now forked from mainstream Lua and
will not be staying in sync with anything past 5.1, so I would
On Monday, January 13, 2014, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:12 AM, Tim Hill drtimh...@gmail.comjavascript:;
wrote:
LuaJIT is currently compatible with Lua 5.1, not 5.2 or the upcoming
5.3, and my understanding is the LuaJIT project has now forked from
mainstream Lua and
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:37 AM, Andrew Starks andrew.sta...@trms.com wrote:
I don't have LuaJit installed and would not install it (and migrate
everything I do over to it) just to use a library. By way of example, your
library may as well have been written for Python, for as much good as it
On Monday, January 13, 2014, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:37 AM, Andrew Starks
andrew.sta...@trms.comjavascript:;
wrote:
I don't have LuaJit installed and would not install it (and migrate
everything I do over to it) just to use a library. By way of example,
your
On Monday, January 13, 2014, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:37 AM, Andrew Starks
andrew.sta...@trms.comjavascript:;
wrote:
I don't have LuaJit installed and would not install it (and migrate
everything I do over to it) just to use a library. By way of example,
your
11 matches
Mail list logo
