Fair enough. My main cause for concern was a confusion about where the
goalposts were.. The message was a response to earlier messages from me
bemoaning the death of IIP and asking people for options for
communicating to users, including the possibility of starting up IIP.
The fact that nobody seem
Look, this is indeed getting silly, so perhaps we can relax, extinguish
the flames, and find some common ground.
Twice in the past a Freenet mailing list has been rendered useless
through off-topic posts. The first time was the Chat mailing list
several years ago which succumbed to flamewars o
Now this is getting silly (or maby it already was), but my weekend has
started and i have a few hours before i'm going to start drinking, so...
>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.devel/14157
>
>
> "implement a useful new feature or fix a significant bug". Hits the
> nail on the
Now which of the fucking folowing mails do "discuss bugs, and the implementation
of near-term new features"?
2 out of 3 of them do without question, and the one that doesn't is
certainly closer than an announcement for a non-Freenet related project.
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet
Toad wrote:
Flamewar can continue on chat. Personally I think the first message was
perfectly valid and Ian's response wasn't.
Let me clarify for you since you are clearly unfamiliar with the remit
of this mailing list as outlined on our website. "This list is for
active developers to discuss bu
Thread bounced from devl. Please reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 04:36:48AM -0700, Sonax wrote:
>
> The author of this freesite [EMAIL PROTECTED],JD2L-
> DGN~nAZTqVI2PCIkg/iiprevival/2// says he is ready to launche a IIP server,
> but he needs public
Flamewar can continue on chat. Personally I think the first message was
perfectly valid and Ian's response wasn't. But if you want to talk about
it, DO SO ON CHAT. I am the moderator and I apologize for contributing
to this thread, however, criticising me for that *here* will just
exacerbate the pr
F*ck off. This is about as on-topic as most of your posts are. IIP is an
essential tool IMHO.
On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 12:57:48PM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote:
> Why the fuck are you spamming the development list with this?
>
> Every time someone inconsiderately decides to spam this with offtopic
> po
Why the fuck are you spamming the development list with this?
Every time someone inconsiderately decides to spam this with offtopic
posts (and no, saying the email is off topic in the subject is no
excuse) we get one step closer to restricting post privileges to those
that can exercise some self
The author of this freesite [EMAIL PROTECTED],JD2L-
DGN~nAZTqVI2PCIkg/iiprevival/2// says he is ready to launche a IIP server,
but he needs public relays. Thought maby some people on this list could
help...
I felt that a lot of people wanted IIP back, but the support for this
guy has not yet bee
Ian Clarke wrote:
> Why the fuck are you spamming the development list with this?
>
> Every time someone inconsiderately decides to spam this with offtopic
> posts (and no, saying the email is off topic in the subject is no
> excuse) we get one step closer to restricting post privileges to thos
11 matches
Mail list logo
