On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 05:59:25PM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> It isn't on a predetermined port - is it?
Hmm. Good point. I wonder how long until they start doing application
proxy only access... Depends on the cost/benefit ratio I suppose...
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It isn't on a predetermined port - is it?
Ian.
On 1 Sep 2004, at 17:55, Toad wrote:
On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 05:54:20PM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Well, this was the whole point of the distribution servlet.
Whi
On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 05:54:20PM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Well, this was the whole point of the distribution servlet.
Which will be blocked at every transparent proxy. If we're lucky they
don't have the hardware to block within an ISP yet.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Well, this was the whole point of the distribution servlet.
Ian.
On 1 Sep 2004, at 17:48, Toad wrote:
Hmm. The current scheme blocks any web page that includes any of the
below
words, correct? They'll just have to download it through an SSL proxy,
or
Hmm. The current scheme blocks any web page that includes any of the below
words, correct? They'll just have to download it through an SSL proxy,
or share it internally... I'm sure there are chinese groups quite
capable of redistributing Freenet.
On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 08:09:37AM +0100, Ian Clark
On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 09:13:11PM -0400, Nick Tarleton wrote:
> > Every new endeavour is worth pursuing. If you don't pursue your dreams
> > because it might upset somebody, somewhere, at some point in the future,
> > then you might as well lay down and let life pass you by. Millions of
> > people
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
From
http://journalism.berkeley.edu/projects/chinadn/en/archives/002885.html
:
It is an open secret that all Chinese Internet hosting services,
including wireless and instant messenger services, filter user
communication through key word blocking m
What's with the lists? There is hardly anything new on it, while I would
have expected a lot of posts due to the new quequeing thingy.
Well, I'll be the first to comment, then:
it doesn't look like it has done much to improve things.
(yes, yes; give it some more time, the network has to settle d
