-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2006 at
10:11:57PM +0200, Helge Preuss wrote:
You're somewhat right about the trouble of getting
connected,
while the net is small it'll be hard but as it grow
chances
are better that you kn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2006 at
09:36:13PM +0200, Helge Preuss wrote:
>> One, can't everybody discover you run freenet by doing a
portscan on
>> your computer? I assume that would be a more efficient way to
>> mass-detect freenet
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 10:11:57PM +0200, Helge Preuss wrote:
> >
> >> You're somewhat right about the trouble of getting connected,
> >> while the net is small it'll be hard but as it grow chances are
> >> better that you know someone who also use it.
> Ah, but that's a fundamental problem: As lon
Hi,
I've been reflecting on my years of intermittent involvement with the
freenet project, and trying to look at the bigger picture of Freenet's
place in the world, and the technical capabilities and limitations which
arise from Freenet's architectural model.
It feels clear to me that the ability
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 09:36:13PM +0200, Helge Preuss wrote:
>
> One, can't everybody discover you run freenet by doing a portscan on
> your computer? I assume that would be a more efficient way to
> mass-detect freenet nodes than smuggling hostile nodes into freenet -
> especially if you're a go
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lars Juel Nielsen wrote:
> On 5/19/06, Helge Preuss
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I just
> listened to the lecture about the new freenet version Ian Clarke
> and Oskar Sandberg gave at the 22C3 (the CCC has released it:
>
http://media.ccc.de/filez/co
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I just listened to the lecture about the new freenet version Ian
Clarke and Oskar Sandberg gave at the 22C3 (the CCC has released it:
http://media.ccc.de/filez/congress/2005/lectures/audio/vorbis/22C3-492-en-freenet_new_version.ogg).
It left open some
