From: Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I would imagine they use the human kind.. afterall they have interns to
sort through the spam. :)
You mean sperm.
*hereby applying for the worst joke of the day*
___
Chat mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: martin chao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I hope some of you are the victims of the next
terrorist attacks. I actually hope some of YOU are
killed by them.
Holy lord. And this is the same man who calls Freenet developers pathetic.
I guess, in this kind of terminology, I would find no word strong
Hm, these characters look REALLY awkward to me... a closing bracket without
an opening bracket?
How about:
5) '!' - example SSK@blah/name!index.html
I think that's legal in uris and shouldn't break any software.
-Stefan
- Original Message -
From: Rob Cakebread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Hi everybody.
It's interesting that Oskar starts to introduce unit testing into the
Freenet core just these days. I strongly support that; I've been test
infected a while ago too.
In a few days, I am going to embark on a somewhat special journey. I'll pack
my Vaio and spend two weeks in Miami
Laughing my ass off... (speaking of which, I should have that tested too,
maybe they'll do it for free)
*sigh* Freenet humor - dry as the air in Miami (not)
- Original Message -
From: Rob Cakebread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 10:59 PM
Subject:
From: Tavin Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think in the final analysis we cannot base our decision on what
happens to it when it's placed under an http:// url.
Things like fproxy are ultimately temporary measures.
Excuse me, but why is this discussion so tedious? It's a small change, and
one that
Hi David,
Freenet would be best served IMO by a handful of major engines, each based
on different methods of spidering, indexing etc. Some spider-based, some
based on keywords, some hand-edited, some automatic etc etc. What one
engine
misses, another will find. We all serve the punters best
MS wants to be independent of Sun - in the long run, they wouldn't be happy
with Java anyway. They tried embrace-and-extend, but this time, it didn't
really work. So now they try to replace Java. It's a question of power.
-Stefan
- Original Message -
From: Richard Forno [EMAIL
From: Greg Wooledge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(1) Where's their search warrant?
They don't necessarily need one (see David's scary story about spineless
providers in New Zealand).
(2) frequest KSK@some/file/that/they/want/to/delete.mp3 foo.mp3
finsert KSK@the/same/file/with/a/different/name.mp3
- Original Message -
From:
Stefan Reich
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2001 01:28
Subject: [freenet-chat] Sourceforge
down again?
I tried to connect to http://www.sourceforge.net from three
different networks - they all failed. Anyone
] Sourceforge
down again?
down from my end too
- Original Message -
From:
Stefan Reich
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2001
01:28
Subject: [freenet-chat] Sourceforge
down again?
I tried to connect
Whoops, you're quick, Ian.
I planned on having a handful of people discover the worst bugs before I let
the crowds rush in.
Hell, whatever, come on in everybody... :-)
Freesite maintainers - what I would be interested in is: is your site listed
in beta.freegle.org? If not, I will try to find
Josh wrote:
I can tell you from experience, because I've been researching the same
thing, distributed security is an oxymoron. Only a single security
authority can make a global file system work.
Why, no. The way Freenet uses public keys to identify publishers and ensure
file integrity is truly
13 matches
Mail list logo
