The attached patch fixes the implementation of the "pseudo" parameters
current-input-port, current-output-port, current-error-port and
current-exception-handler which now return the correct value in the
assignment case.
Also, some types.db entries have been corrected.
cheers,
felix
commit 54fa2
From: Christian Kellermann
Subject: [Chicken-hackers] [patch] error out when installing nonexistant egg
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 23:47:41 +0200
> Hi,
>
> attached is a small patch for issue 683. With it chicken-install
> errors out on non existant extensions and returns an error code of
> 1.
>
>
From: Peter Bex
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] corrected "smashing" of pair/vector/list
component types
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 21:37:54 +0200
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 04:34:38AM -0400, Felix wrote:
>> Corrected "smashing" of pair/list/vector component types after
>> call to possibly mod
>
> I'm probably overlooking something, but it looks like the now-first
> "or" case (around line 1016) walks the types twice.
> Once by over-all-instantiations and then again in the anonymous
> procedure it passes as argument for "combine", which does
> (if (or exact all) (every (cut match1 t1 <>)
Hi,
attached is a small patch for issue 683. With it chicken-install
errors out on non existant extensions and returns an error code of
1.
I am not so sure whether this is the best solution, since
retrieve-extension should return #f if there is no such file, but
I guess this is due to a change in
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 04:34:38AM -0400, Felix wrote:
> Corrected "smashing" of pair/list/vector component types after
> call to possibly modifying procedure. The existing code refered
> to the incorrect type specifier "pair-of".
Looks fine, please apply it.
I still can't make git apply patches
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 01:16:01PM +0200, Felix wrote:
> This commit fixes several problems with the scrutinizer:
>
> - instantiations of type-variables need to be done over all alternatives
> in a union ("or") type
I'm probably overlooking something, but it looks like the now-first
"or" case (
Christian Kellermann scripsit:
> There is one discrepancy left as we do follow symlinks by default
> and the docs say the opposite. Which way is the better behaviour?
> I will change either the default or the docs then.
I agree with other posters: the default should be not to follow symlinks,
as
From: Peter Bex
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] Remove old variant of find-files
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 10:45:08 +0200
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:38:50AM +0200, Moritz Heidkamp wrote:
>>
>> Christian Kellermann writes:
>> > this is a simple patch to remove the deprecated variant of find-files.
* Peter Bex [110922 10:45]:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:38:50AM +0200, Moritz Heidkamp wrote:
> > I'm not entirely sure what would be a sensible default myself. FWIW the
> > GNU find program doesn't follow symlinks by default.
>
> I think that's safer since symlinks can create cycles which might
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:38:50AM +0200, Moritz Heidkamp wrote:
>
> Christian Kellermann writes:
> > this is a simple patch to remove the deprecated variant of find-files.
> > As it is now the old variant is always choosen when calling find-files
> > with just 1 argument.
>
> Looks good to me!
Christian Kellermann writes:
> this is a simple patch to remove the deprecated variant of find-files.
> As it is now the old variant is always choosen when calling find-files
> with just 1 argument.
Looks good to me! I don't really get that "we want `cons' inlined"
comment in the original versio
Hi,
this is a simple patch to remove the deprecated variant of find-files.
As it is now the old variant is always choosen when calling find-files
with just 1 argument.
There is one discrepancy left as we do follow symlinks by default
and the docs say the opposite. Which way is the better behaviou
Hi!
Could someone please review my scrutinizer patches? They
are quite critical to make the type-analysis (more) correct.
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hacke
14 matches
Mail list logo
