On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 09:50:31PM +0100, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
> To be consistent with the handling of other distinguished objects like
> "()" (expressed as "null") and the eof-of-file-object (likewise "eof")
> it would be great, if we had "true" and "false" to restrict these
> beyond the ra
Let's explain the idea by example.
There are many standard (or srfi) procedures, which take either
a distinguished type or (often) a boolean value (typically #f).
For instance mutex-lock: the 1st optional argument is either
a timeout or #f the second is either a thread or #f.
Written as type de
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 08:12:18PM +0100, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
> Not at all. I forgot to mention: it relies only on
> ##sys#thread-block-for-i/o!
> and skips the single-fd ##net#select-write stuff entirely
> for the sake of fairer scheduling.
>
> >I'll need some time to dig in and see why
On Mar 20 2013, Peter Bex wrote:
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 02:27:41PM +0100, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
Hi all,
During the development I learned that Peter is *absolutely
correct* about the "strange error message" I needed help to
interpret a few days back. (When the logged error indicated
tha
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 02:27:41PM +0100, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> During the development I learned that Peter is *absolutely
> correct* about the "strange error message" I needed help to
> interpret a few days back. (When the logged error indicated
> that a type test - (struct )
Hi all,
I'm not yet convinced that this patch will fix everything screwed
up by use of the tcp implementation.
The past days I wrote a replacement for my use. (A bit incomplete
wrt. API compatibility to the tcp unit and thrown into a module
I'm using to drive the SSL/TLS implementation I'm usin
On Mar 18 2013, Felix wrote:
From: Peter Bex
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH 3/4] Remove ##sys#expand-home-path.
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 21:22:12 +0100
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 02:03:41PM -0400, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
Maybe I'm too paranoid? Or missing something?
No, you're spo
