From: Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Avoid context switch during TCP errno
reporting
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 22:34:46 +0100
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:18:48PM +0100, Peter Bex wrote:
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 08:30:23PM -0400, John Cowan wrote:
However,
From: Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] non-termination with (declare (inline
...))
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 19:58:43 +0100
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 11:31:04PM +0100, Felix wrote:
The attached patch changes the inline declaration, when used with an
identifier,
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 07:13:21PM +0100, Felix wrote:
I'm trying to figure out how this relates to inline-global.
I noticed that inline-global calls
(cut mark-variable '##compiler#inline-global 'no) for
each identifier. Shouldn't that be 'yes? And can this cause
the same kind of
The patch also did not update the debugging message in
C_set_or_change_heap_size.
-C_dbg(C_text(debug), C_text(heap resized to %d bytes\n), (int)heap);
+C_dbg(C_text(debug), C_text(heap resized to %zu bytes\n), heap);
%zu is a C99-ism, I don't know if people are ok with that.
So
From: Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Avoid context switch during TCP errno
reporting
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 19:11:56 +0100
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 07:08:19PM +0100, Felix wrote:
Actually, scratch that. Unless this means that the current
implementation
From: Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] non-termination with (declare (inline
...))
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 19:26:07 +0100
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 07:13:21PM +0100, Felix wrote:
I'm trying to figure out how this relates to inline-global.
I noticed that
From: Jörg F. Wittenberger joerg.wittenber...@softeyes.net
Subject: [Chicken-hackers] testcase -strict-types
Date: 24 Mar 2013 21:00:30 +0100
The attached code fails when compiled with -strict-types.
$ csc -strict-types -verbose strcttps.scm /usr/bin/chicken
strcttps.scm -output-file
However there's an exception: I know (at least) one Scheme
implementation,
which bails out badly on the token #!rest .
Thus I'm forced to carefully keep those type declarations within
the chicken module instead of the actual code.
Would it be feasible to have an alternate read syntax
From: Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] non-termination with (declare (inline
...))
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 21:59:30 +0100
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 09:50:21PM +0100, Felix wrote:
My other question remains: couldn't
the inline-global with value 'yes cause a
