Removed ##sys#expand-path from sql-de-lite's open-database in 0.6.3, in favor
of requiring the user to call pathname-expand on the argument if desired. I
don't think this will break anybody's code, but let me know.
Jim
On Jul 7, 2014, at 11:58 AM, Peter Bex wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 11
Hi Felix,
I don't have a substantive reply just ATM, but I have also put some
ideas and tagged some identifiers with where they might go in a
reogranization at: http://wiki.call-cc.org/core-libraries-reorganization
Cheers,
Evan
___
Chicken-hackers mai
Hello, again...
I am currently trying to put together a plan about the library
restructuring that seems to be badly needed to make the core libraries
smaller, more fine-grained and hopefully easier to use.
* As already stated, I think it would be good to move some units
into eggs. Currently t
On 2014-07-07 22:34, Felix Winkelmann wrote:
> I think the types.db entry for "append" is wrong, as it will produce
> a warning when the last argument is a non-list, which is still valid
> (for example when creating together lambda-lists).
Quite right, pushed.
Cheers,
Evan
_
Hello!
Here another (and proper) patch: it allows functor arguments to be
optional, giving the author or a functor a way to provide a default,
which seems to be quite useful. I think this patch was submitted
before, but seems to have been forgotten.
This patch also fixes a bug in the functor-arg
Hello!
I think the types.db entry for "append" is wrong, as it will produce
a warning when the last argument is a non-list, which is still valid
(for example when creating together lambda-lists).
diff --git a/types.db b/types.db
index a66f044..bb9bb8e 100644
--- a/types.db
+++ b/types.db
@@ -16
Sounds good, I only use the tilde expansion, and that responsibility could
probably even be removed and given to the caller. In my opinion the $FOO
expansion can be jettisoned completely.
Jim
> On Jul 7, 2014, at 11:58, Peter Bex wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 11:43:20AM -0500, Jim Ursett
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 11:43:20AM -0500, Jim Ursetto wrote:
> Thanks Peter!
> Does this egg work with older Chicken versions? I.e. can I safely replace
> ##sys#expand-home-path in sql-de-lite with pathname-expand across the board?
> Jim
That should work just fine.
Because the algorithm is sligh
Thanks Peter!
Does this egg work with older Chicken versions? I.e. can I safely replace
##sys#expand-home-path in sql-de-lite with pathname-expand across the board?
Jim
> On Jun 22, 2014, at 6:43, Peter Bex wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 01:05:55PM +, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
>> H
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 09:50:57AM -0300, Arthur Maciel wrote:
> Peter, thank you very much for always kindly answering my silly questions.
>
> This info helps me a lot to understand more the chicken core. As time is
> limited, I have to finish an egg first, implement the new wiki style
> secondly
Peter, thank you very much for always kindly answering my silly questions.
This info helps me a lot to understand more the chicken core. As time is
limited, I have to finish an egg first, implement the new wiki style
secondly and in third place start looking into core seriously.
But just to antic
On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 05:01:18PM -0300, Arthur Maciel wrote:
> Probably all my doubts are due to my ignorance about C and computer
> internals, but I would love to understand more the chicken.h file.
> (
> http://code.call-cc.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=chicken-core.git;a=blob;f=chicken.h;h=f5a103ee
12 matches
Mail list logo
