On 19.08.2014 19:24, Felix Winkelmann wrote:
Sounds like a good first step, even though I personally would prefer
UCS-4 strings (constant lookup + modification and so on). But that
seems to be unpopular, AFAICT...
Wouldn`t that be possible to specify which internal string encoding is
used
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 11:59:58AM +0400, Yaroslav Tsarko wrote:
On 19.08.2014 19:24, Felix Winkelmann wrote:
Sounds like a good first step, even though I personally would prefer
UCS-4 strings (constant lookup + modification and so on). But that
seems to be unpopular, AFAICT...
Wouldn`t
From: Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] CR #1142 and upcoming changes
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 10:02:51 +0200
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 11:59:58AM +0400, Yaroslav Tsarko wrote:
On 19.08.2014 19:24, Felix Winkelmann wrote:
Sounds like a good first step, even though I
Hi,
The Chicken wiki still has an index of Chicken 3 eggs, although I do
think chicken-setup is no longer operational.
Perhaps now would be a good time to clean the wiki of vestigial
references to 2 3.
AIUI, this documentation is preserved for posterity and in case anyone
wants to forward
Hi,
I'd love to hear from some of the people using CHICKEN in their business
or for other Serious Projects (Kristian? Ivan? Andy?) how painful this
would be for them.
After taking some time to familiarise myself with them, these all sound
like big and important changes.
It took us a long
Felix Winkelmann scripsit:
Well, actually we might as well support several: ASCII/Latin-1, UTF-8
and UCS-2/UCS-4. Without UTF-8 it would just be a variable
element-size option. But I agree that this doesn't make maintenance
any easier... Let's think some more about this. We don't have to
HI Peter,
Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl writes:
This seems like a good idea. However, could you also swap the two
code blocks? A double negation (#ifndef NO_...) can be confusing, and
by making it read #ifdef NO_POSIX_POLL (I'd probably drop the
HAVE_ prefix, as that's more idiomatic
