On 08/29/14 23:01, Peter Bex wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 10:50:31PM +0400, Oleg Kolosov wrote:
>> On 08/23/14 19:35, Peter Bex wrote:
>>> I've made a start on the wiki, at what we'd like CHICKEN 5 to be about.
>>
>> I've remembered one more thing: why not stick the terminating '\0' at
>> the e
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 04:11:21PM -0300, Arthur Maciel wrote:
> Peter, I remember you wrote about this on 2012, right?
>
> http://www.more-magic.net/posts/lessons-learned-from-nul-byte-bugs.html
Correct, I think this is an important safety feature of a high-level
language. In fact, I was the on
2014-08-29 16:01 GMT-03:00 Peter Bex :
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 10:50:31PM +0400, Oleg Kolosov wrote:
> > On 08/23/14 19:35, Peter Bex wrote:
> > > I've made a start on the wiki, at what we'd like CHICKEN 5 to be about.
> >
> > I've remembered one more thing: why not stick the terminating '\0' at
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 10:50:31PM +0400, Oleg Kolosov wrote:
> On 08/23/14 19:35, Peter Bex wrote:
> > I've made a start on the wiki, at what we'd like CHICKEN 5 to be about.
>
> I've remembered one more thing: why not stick the terminating '\0' at
> the end of all strings in internal representat
On 08/23/14 19:35, Peter Bex wrote:
> I've made a start on the wiki, at what we'd like CHICKEN 5 to be about.
I've remembered one more thing: why not stick the terminating '\0' at
the end of all strings in internal representation? This looks pretty
harmless but could make some common FFI uses a br
