On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 01:02:18AM +0200, Felix Winkelmann wrote:
Hello!
I have signed off a squash commit of all your changes and pushed it
to a new branch (chicken-5). I have a proposal for more meaningful
module names, though, and I will post a patch in the next days.
Thanks for
Hi all,
While working on the numbers egg, I noticed we don't have a size
calculation macro for record types and closures. Attached is a patch
to add these. Please note that the size calculation of the closure
in C_call_with_cthulhu was wrong, as well as the allocation in
handle_interrupt
I did wonder why you squashed the commits; like I said, I put a lot
of effort into making them self-contained (and every single commit
compiles and passes the testsuite). By squashing them, it becomes
one big blob commit. If this commit introduces a bug, git bisect
will be mostly useless,
While working on the numbers egg, I noticed we don't have a size
calculation macro for record types and closures. Attached is a patch
to add these. Please note that the size calculation of the closure
in C_call_with_cthulhu was wrong, as well as the allocation in
handle_interrupt (including
From: Arthur Maciel arthurmac...@gmail.com
Subject: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH(5)] Removed #+debugbuild map-se duplication
and corrected typo in modules.scm
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2014 17:08:58 -0300
Dear chickeneers,
This is just a cosmetic patch to correct a typo and remove a function
definition
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 11:30:20PM +0200, Felix Winkelmann wrote:
Ok. The former really allocates a slot too much, but that makes no
difference besides wasting a word in the nursery.
Not too much of a problem, but it would increase the minor GC frequency,
even if by a little bit.
The latter
BTW, has this patch not been pushed yet?
--
http://www.more-magic.net
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
