On 2015-10-29 20:06, Peter Bex wrote:
> On one hand, I don't really like the fact that we're renaming the
> existing option. We could just drop support for the implicit
> "main" or keep the old name and use a different name for the new one.
Yeah, I very nearly omitted the -main-module option,
On Sun, Oct 04, 2015 at 10:32:07PM +1300, Evan Hanson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Here's an opinion patch. :)
>
> I'd like to be able to specify a module name on the command line, in the
> same way that one can specify "-unit foo".
>
> There's some other cleanup in the patch, too, including a fix for
> This is a bit of a niche option, isn't it? I don't really see the use
> of it: nothing gets exported anyway, so why should the name of the
> module matter? Besides, wrapping something in a module isn't really
> that useful, except maybe to catch errors.
>
> I'd like to hear the opinion of
