On 2015-11-01 1:36, felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote:
> Is this really necessary? I think runtime.c is already complicated
> enough as it is. I understand your intent, but I'm always wary of
> "arbitrary fixes to reasonable limitations, just because they are
> limitations".
I agree about the run
Em 01/11/2015 07:44, "Peter Bex" escreveu:
>
> On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 01:36:53AM +0100, felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com
wrote:
> > Is this really necessary? I think runtime.c is already complicated
enough as it
> > is. I understand your intent, but I'm always wary of "arbitrary fixes
to reasonable
>
On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 01:36:53AM +0100, felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote:
> Is this really necessary? I think runtime.c is already complicated enough as
> it
> is. I understand your intent, but I'm always wary of "arbitrary fixes to
> reasonable
> limitations, just because they are limitations
