[Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] [5] Reject define-values outside the toplevel

Hi all, I noticed that an ill-placed "define-values" can still result in new toplevel variables being defined. In order to make this work without problems, I had to get rid of "##core#define-toplevel" and replace it with a pure check. Now the defining macros expand to something like this:

[Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix broken compilation on NetBSD due to feature macros

Hi all, In a drive-by bugreport on IRC, it was noted that the build is broken on NetBSD due to the newly added feature macros. This includes 4.12.0, so I think the attached patch should go to master as well as chicken-5. Cheers, Peter From 804ad0b66638d6016a2f25e8c5cad3424ff2d4aa Mon Sep 17

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix a logical bug in the optimizer

On Sun, Apr 02, 2017 at 09:14:01PM +0200, felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote: > I don't fully understand your remark, but the point is that the a conditional > results in an unknown execution path. A call on the other hand may > result in all possible things (access of the 1st def of "foo" above,

Re: [Chicken-hackers] (no subject)

On Sun, Apr 09, 2017 at 10:26:31AM +0200, Kristian Lein-Mathisen wrote: > Sorry about the missing subject. Here's another patch, for the > chicken.syntax module. Hi again, The same comments apply to this patch as to the previous one: we don't want to add another compilation unit to core. > Is

Re: [Chicken-hackers] (no subject)

On Sun, Apr 09, 2017 at 09:01:16AM +0200, Kristian Lein-Mathisen wrote: > Hello dear CHICKEN core members, > > Here's my attempt at making a chicken.load module. Hi Kristian, Thanks for putting in some effort on CHICKEN 5! I know this is tricky stuff to work on, so I'm glad you're taking the

Re: [Chicken-hackers] (no subject)

Sorry about the missing subject. Here's another patch, for the chicken.syntax module. Is this, btw, the right way to submit patches to core? K. On 4/9/17, Kristian Lein-Mathisen wrote: > Hello dear CHICKEN core members, > > Here's my attempt at making a chicken.load

[Chicken-hackers] (no subject)

Hello dear CHICKEN core members, Here's my attempt at making a chicken.load module. It was fairly straight-forward, except I don't know what to do with the unit declaration regarding (fixnum) and (disable-interrrupts), so I copied file.scm's: (declare (unit load) (uses eval) (fixnum) ;;