[Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Two small changes for the (chicken port) module

Hi all, Attached are two simple patches to make the (chicken port) module conform a bit better to core-libraries-reorganization. Cheers, Peter From 8a2fdff30184a00907bcf6aaf27338fbebda2020 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Bex Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 21:46:38 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Move se

[Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Another symbol GC sanity check fix [was: Re: [PATCH] Fix record type tags to be nonglobal by module-prefixing them]

On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 09:55:21AM +1200, Evan Hanson wrote: > Regarding whether to namespace the core record types, I think we > probably _should_ do so, but it's not a priority. Fun fact: Because we now define it as a symbol, we trigger another GC sanity check assertion failure... The problem i

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix record type tags to be nonglobal by module-prefixing them

On 2017-07-18 8:30, Peter Bex wrote: On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 09:55:21AM +1200, Evan Hanson wrote: Regarding whether to namespace the core record types, I think we probably _should_ do so, but it's not a priority. My attitude towards wrapping the tags in a record type is similar; I'd be fine wit

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix record type tags to be nonglobal by module-prefixing them

On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 7:28 PM, Evan Hanson wrote: I really think we should hide the hash prefixing as much as possible. > It's an implementation detail and not something users should interact > with directly. The right way to distinguish these things is through the > module language. > Per con