> On 2018-10-24 9:31, felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote:
> > > The patch looks OK to me. Just one question, having more to do with the
> > > feature it adds than the patch itself: now that chicken-do supports
> > > multiple targets, should the import libraries for modules be added as
> > >
On 2018-10-24 9:31, felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote:
> > The patch looks OK to me. Just one question, having more to do with the
> > feature it adds than the patch itself: now that chicken-do supports
> > multiple targets, should the import libraries for modules be added as
> > targets in
On Oct 24 2018, Peter Bex wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 09:33:02PM +0200, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
Hi all,
with Chicken 5 being about to be released I know there is no adding
features now.
That's why I hesitate to post at all. At the other hand I'd guess it
might be easier to now add
> Hi Felix,
>
> The patch looks OK to me. Just one question, having more to do with the
> feature it adds than the patch itself: now that chicken-do supports
> multiple targets, should the import libraries for modules be added as
> targets in addition to the types and inline files?
Do you mean
Hi Felix,
The patch looks OK to me. Just one question, having more to do with the
feature it adds than the patch itself: now that chicken-do supports
multiple targets, should the import libraries for modules be added as
targets in addition to the types and inline files?
Evan
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 09:33:02PM +0200, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> with Chicken 5 being about to be released I know there is no adding
> features now.
>
> That's why I hesitate to post at all. At the other hand I'd guess it
> might be easier to now add half the feature I'd