Re: [Chicken-hackers] {{{PATCH}}} generalize chicken-do to allow multiple targets

2018-10-24 Thread felix . winkelmann
> On 2018-10-24 9:31, felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote: > > > The patch looks OK to me. Just one question, having more to do with the > > > feature it adds than the patch itself: now that chicken-do supports > > > multiple targets, should the import libraries for modules be added as > > >

Re: [Chicken-hackers] {{{PATCH}}} generalize chicken-do to allow multiple targets

2018-10-24 Thread Evan Hanson
On 2018-10-24 9:31, felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote: > > The patch looks OK to me. Just one question, having more to do with the > > feature it adds than the patch itself: now that chicken-do supports > > multiple targets, should the import libraries for modules be added as > > targets in

Re: [Chicken-hackers] Would SRFI-157 (pre)support worth a consideration?

2018-10-24 Thread Jörg F . Wittenberger
On Oct 24 2018, Peter Bex wrote: On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 09:33:02PM +0200, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote: Hi all, with Chicken 5 being about to be released I know there is no adding features now. That's why I hesitate to post at all. At the other hand I'd guess it might be easier to now add

Re: [Chicken-hackers] {{{PATCH}}} generalize chicken-do to allow multiple targets

2018-10-24 Thread felix . winkelmann
> Hi Felix, > > The patch looks OK to me. Just one question, having more to do with the > feature it adds than the patch itself: now that chicken-do supports > multiple targets, should the import libraries for modules be added as > targets in addition to the types and inline files? Do you mean

Re: [Chicken-hackers] {{{PATCH}}} generalize chicken-do to allow multiple targets

2018-10-24 Thread Evan Hanson
Hi Felix, The patch looks OK to me. Just one question, having more to do with the feature it adds than the patch itself: now that chicken-do supports multiple targets, should the import libraries for modules be added as targets in addition to the types and inline files? Evan

Re: [Chicken-hackers] Would SRFI-157 (pre)support worth a consideration?

2018-10-24 Thread Peter Bex
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 09:33:02PM +0200, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote: > Hi all, > > with Chicken 5 being about to be released I know there is no adding > features now. > > That's why I hesitate to post at all. At the other hand I'd guess it > might be easier to now add half the feature I'd