On Sun, Dec 01, 2019 at 11:22:37PM +0100, felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote:
> It seems to work fine, but "-:hs0" doesn't seem to work. I tried
>
> csi -:d -:hs0
> > (define x (make-vector 1000))
> > (##sys#gc)
> > (##sys#gc)
> > ...
>
> The heap is still shrunk on each
> Hi all,
>
> As suggested by Sven Hartrumpf in #1379, the current logic which
> decides when the heap should be shrunk is confusing and looks
> "obviously wrong".
>
> For one, the "count" variable indicates the actual used memory.
> This is in one half of the heap, so it seems incorrect to me to
Hi all,
As suggested by Sven Hartrumpf in #1379, the current logic which
decides when the heap should be shrunk is confusing and looks
"obviously wrong".
For one, the "count" variable indicates the actual used memory.
This is in one half of the heap, so it seems incorrect to me to
calculate the
Hi,
Here's some more improvement on the #1649 issue.
This patch just drops the procedure annotation if scrutinizer can infer
it anyway. This gives the scrutinizer a change to make the type a bit
more accurate.
It's still not optimal, though.
The first two commits are just straight-forward
