On 2020-04-12 19:11, Peter Bex wrote:
> What's the deal with the FAIL for knucleotide in both patched versions?
Oh, that's because knucleotide needs srfi-69 and I didn't install it for
the testing builds.
Here's the comparison for that benchmark with srfi-69 installed. It's
pretty similar to the
On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 12:48:12PM +0200, felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote:
> Attached is a patch to address #1689 by moving the argc check for a known
> procedure call into the analysis phase (on first analysis) so that even with
> -O0
> this check is done, as runtime-checks are disabled for
On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 10:10:13AM +1300, Evan Hanson wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I've played around with this first patch a bit, and I think I've found a
> way to apply the same technique without complicating the logic in
> C_reclaim(). Attached is a sign-off of megane's patch that introduces
> the
