Re: [PATCH] fix for #1689 (argc check with -O0)

2020-04-19 Thread Peter Bex
On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 06:54:31PM +0200, felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote: > My attempt to use the "potential-values" db entry doesn't seem to > lead to anything, all I can come up with in the moment is this lame > attempt to fix the situation, i.e. by only signalling an error for > non-global

Re: [PATCH] fix for #1689 (argc check with -O0)

2020-04-19 Thread felix . winkelmann
My attempt to use the "potential-values" db entry doesn't seem to lead to anything, all I can come up with in the moment is this lame attempt to fix the situation, i.e. by only signalling an error for non-global bindings. Due to various transformations (which are even done with -O0) it is not easy

[PATCH] A few simplifications/maintainability improvements of the GC

2020-04-19 Thread Peter Bex
Hi all, After the recent patches to the GC, I was looking over that code again and decided it would be quite easy to make that code a lot more readable and maintainable, with less if statements and getting rid of a few gotos, as well. I haven't yet managed to get rid of i_like_spaghetti, though