On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 11:05:36AM +0200, felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote:
> A patch by alicemaz, see #1713.
Thanks, pushed.
Cheers,
Peter
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 01:47:07PM +, Diego wrote:
> I wonder if it makes more sense to cache by (chicken-version) instead. For
> example, is there a reason that two chicken installs with different
> prefix/suffix shouldn't share the cache if their version were the same?
They may have differ
I wonder if it makes more sense to cache by (chicken-version) instead. For
example, is there a reason that two chicken installs with different
prefix/suffix shouldn't share the cache if their version were the same?
On the other hand, I see the point that different installs explicitly
(pre|suf)f
A patch by alicemaz, see #1713.
felix
From b6b56495a686b6d774d94232d29cfdb56176cec1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: felix
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 11:02:16 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Use program name if chicken-install as cache directory name.
This patch weas proposed by alicemaz (see #1713).
Signe
> On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 01:13:17PM +0200, Peter Bex wrote:
> > Here's another trivial one in the same vein.
>
> And another one (I think this is the last one).
>
Pushed.
felix
