Re: [Chicken-hackers] (no subject)

On Sun, Apr 09, 2017 at 10:26:31AM +0200, Kristian Lein-Mathisen wrote: > Sorry about the missing subject. Here's another patch, for the > chicken.syntax module. Hi again, The same comments apply to this patch as to the previous one: we don't want to add another compilation unit to core. > Is

Re: [Chicken-hackers] (no subject)

On Sun, Apr 09, 2017 at 09:01:16AM +0200, Kristian Lein-Mathisen wrote: > Hello dear CHICKEN core members, > > Here's my attempt at making a chicken.load module. Hi Kristian, Thanks for putting in some effort on CHICKEN 5! I know this is tricky stuff to work on, so I'm glad you're taking the

Re: [Chicken-hackers] (no subject)

Sorry about the missing subject. Here's another patch, for the chicken.syntax module. Is this, btw, the right way to submit patches to core? K. On 4/9/17, Kristian Lein-Mathisen wrote: > Hello dear CHICKEN core members, > > Here's my attempt at making a chicken.load

[Chicken-hackers] (no subject)

Hello dear CHICKEN core members, Here's my attempt at making a chicken.load module. It was fairly straight-forward, except I don't know what to do with the unit declaration regarding (fixnum) and (disable-interrrupts), so I copied file.scm's: (declare (unit load) (uses eval) (fixnum) ;;

[Chicken-hackers] (no subject)

>From 2696fbf685d271a2d3c3001fef8f5c894cc05a66 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Timo=20Myyr=C3=A4?= Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 08:31:01 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 1/1] rewrite chicken manuals to use mdoc(7) This makes the mdoc(7) format the default on all platforms. If