Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH][4][5] Add arity checks for ##core#proc-class platform rewrites

2015-03-31 Thread Moritz Heidkamp
Hey Evan, On 22 March 2015 06:36 CET, Evan Hanson wrote: Let me know if any of that was unclear. The patch against 5 is obviously more important, but I'd like them both to go in, assuming they look OK. thanks a lot for this thorough explanation and for digging into this issue in the first

[Chicken-hackers] [PATCH][4][5] Add arity checks for ##core#proc-class platform rewrites

2015-03-21 Thread Evan Hanson
Hi hackers, Earlier today Peter came across an issue on the chicken-5 branch where the program `(number-string)` would produce bad C and fail to compile due to a C procedure being called with too few arguments. I traced this back to the c-platform rewrite from `number-string` to