Hey Evan,
On 22 March 2015 06:36 CET, Evan Hanson wrote:
Let me know if any of that was unclear. The patch against 5 is obviously
more important, but I'd like them both to go in, assuming they look OK.
thanks a lot for this thorough explanation and for digging into this
issue in the first
Hi hackers,
Earlier today Peter came across an issue on the chicken-5 branch where
the program `(number-string)` would produce bad C and fail to compile
due to a C procedure being called with too few arguments.
I traced this back to the c-platform rewrite from `number-string` to