Hello folks,
I've just discovered some nasty regressions caused by the second patch
so please hold on before applying it;
I'm also withdrawing the third patch as I've managed to get the
scrutinizer to infer the correct types for the ffi
stubs with just a minimal amount of changes, I need to test
On 05/29, Peter Bex wrote:
> On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 11:29:06PM +0200, lemonboy wrote:
> > Hello hackers,
>
> Hi Lemonboy,
>
> Thanks (again!) for your patches. You're really putting in quite
> the effort.
>
Thanks for the kind words :)
> I have two comments about the patch, and a more generic
On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 11:29:06PM +0200, lemonboy wrote:
> Hello hackers,
Hi Lemonboy,
Thanks (again!) for your patches. You're really putting in quite
the effort.
> I'll be brief:
> - The first patch fixes a problem where we'd fail to consider the
> internal defines as toplevel ones,
>
Hello hackers,
I'll be brief:
- The first patch fixes a problem where we'd fail to consider the
internal defines as toplevel ones,
leading to a compiler error.
- The second patch complements the first by rejecting more `define-`
forms in non-toplevel contexts.
- The third one is slightly beefier
