Hello, seeing the patches flowing, I’ve decided to give it a try too, and push
few things related to the MS Visual Studio support.
This one is pretty harmless, just to check the process out.
I have patched few other things in the core (like cond fixes, nan/inf handling,
removed gcc specifics, a
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 06:02:45PM +0400, Oleg Kolosov wrote:
> Hello, seeing the patches flowing, I’ve decided to give it a try too, and
> push few things related to the MS Visual Studio support.
>
> This one is pretty harmless, just to check the process out.
Hello Oleg,
Thanks for the patch,
On 19 Oct 2014, at 18:17, Peter Bex wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 06:02:45PM +0400, Oleg Kolosov wrote:
>> Hello, seeing the patches flowing, I’ve decided to give it a try too, and
>> push few things related to the MS Visual Studio support.
>>
>> This one is pretty harmless, just to check
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 07:24:23PM +0400, Oleg Kolosov wrote:
> On 19 Oct 2014, at 18:17, Peter Bex wrote:
> > Thanks for the patch, it looks good. I've pushed it to master and
> > chicken-5. Please note that this is not the best test for the process,
> > because we normally require double sign-
On 19 Oct 2014, at 19:32, Peter Bex wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 07:24:23PM +0400, Oleg Kolosov wrote:
>>
>> Do you mean that I should sign-off by myself and ask somebody on IRC to
>> review and sign-off too? I’ve looked on http://wiki.call-cc.org/contribute -
>> it says “send them to th
Peter Bex scripsit:
> I'd hesitate to apply them, because we wouldn't be able to maintain
> them. We'd need msvc support so we can verify things still work if
> we change things up. Do you think you could write a Windows Makefile
> which uses the msvc compiler?
That is what CMake does anyway: i
> I agree. The current Chicken build system is admirable in its simplicity.
> There is no reason why a Windows make file and associated .h file couldn't
> be bundled with Chicken after being generated offline by CMake.
I don't think CMake is intended to be used this way - there may be
system-spec
On 19 Oct 2014, at 21:23, John Cowan wrote:
>
> Peter Bex scripsit:
>
>> I'd hesitate to apply them, because we wouldn't be able to maintain
>> them. We'd need msvc support so we can verify things still work if
>> we change things up. Do you think you could write a Windows Makefile
>> which us
