* Jim Ursetto [130316 20:29]:
> If this patch was acceptable, could someone please apply it? Thanks.
Good for me! I have pushed it.
Thanks and sorry it took so long...
--
In the world, there is nothing more submissive and weak than
water. Yet for attacking that which is hard and strong, nothi
If this patch was acceptable, could someone please apply it? Thanks.
Jim
On Feb 19, 2013, at 9:45 AM, Jim Ursetto wrote:
> No, it returns 0 to indicate that zero seconds of sleep time remain (it was
> not interrupted), just like posix sleep. See the UNIX code, the Windows code
> prior to the
No, it returns 0 to indicate that zero seconds of sleep time remain (it was not
interrupted), just like posix sleep. See the UNIX code, the Windows code prior
to the regression, sleep(3), and the chicken docs.
Jim
On Feb 19, 2013, at 4:34, Peter Bex wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 02:03:44AM
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 02:03:44AM -0600, Jim Ursetto wrote:
> sleep accepts any type arg but should accept only fixnums; also fix a
> regression in be44f5328.
Shouldn't it return undefined rather than 0? This seems like a bug in
the original implementation.
Cheers,
Peter
--
http://www.more-ma
sleep accepts any type arg but should accept only fixnums; also fix a
regression in be44f5328.
0001-Ensure-sleep-seconds-is-a-fixnum-on-Windows-also-don.patch
Description: Binary data
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
https:/
