On Sun, Dec 01, 2013 at 11:31:31AM -0500, John Cowan wrote:
> Peter Bex scripsit:
>
> > However, I've tested all three Windows builds, and they all behave
> > equally well (or better) with s[n]printf() instead of gcvt(). We no
> > longer have a MSVC build, so the original problem probably was th
Peter Bex scripsit:
> However, I've tested all three Windows builds, and they all behave
> equally well (or better) with s[n]printf() instead of gcvt(). We no
> longer have a MSVC build, so the original problem probably was there,
As of Visual C++ 2005, Microsoft deprecated all the functions in
Hi Peter,
Peter Bex writes:
>
> In order to fix #566, I decided it's much easier to rip out the
> HAVE_GCVT definition in Cygwin. After testing on several platforms,
> it turns out that gcvt() is really not required, and it's deprecated
> by POSIX as well. So we should probably stop using it an
Hi all,
In order to fix #566, I decided it's much easier to rip out the
HAVE_GCVT definition in Cygwin. After testing on several platforms,
it turns out that gcvt() is really not required, and it's deprecated
by POSIX as well. So we should probably stop using it anyway; this
also simplifies test
