On 2018-07-08 11:10, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
> Good point. Thanks for pointing that out. Attached is a cleaned up
> version.
Great, thanks Mario. Applied.
Evan
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org
Hi Evan,
On Thu, 5 Jul 2018 21:03:02 +1200 Evan Hanson wrote:
> Hey Mario,
>
> This seems fine to me in concept.
>
>> -#elif defined(__arm__)
>> +#elif defined(__arm__) && !defined(__arm64__) && !defined(__aarch64__)
>> # define C_MACHINE_TYPE "arm"
>> +#elif defined(__arm64__) || defined(__aar
Hey Mario,
This seems fine to me in concept.
> -#elif defined(__arm__)
> +#elif defined(__arm__) && !defined(__arm64__) && !defined(__aarch64__)
> # define C_MACHINE_TYPE "arm"
> +#elif defined(__arm64__) || defined(__aarch64__)
> +# define C_MACHINE_TYPE "arm64"
Can we check for just defined(_
Hi Peter,
On Fri, 29 Jun 2018 07:03:24 +0200 Peter Bex wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 04:05:50PM +0200, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Attached is a patch to make CHICKEN identify arm64 architectures. It
>> should apply to both C4 and C5 trees.
>
> Is there a reason simply "arm"
On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 04:05:50PM +0200, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Attached is a patch to make CHICKEN identify arm64 architectures. It
> should apply to both C4 and C5 trees.
Is there a reason simply "arm" is not sufficient? I don't know much
about this stuff TBH.
Cheers,
Peter
Hi,
Attached is a patch to make CHICKEN identify arm64 architectures. It
should apply to both C4 and C5 trees.
All the best.
Mario
--
http://parenteses.org/mario
>From 5e293c67e0d2062fd7481225d06e4545846b3d62 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mario Domenech Goulart
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2018 12:02:51
