From: Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] non-termination with (declare (inline
...))
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 19:58:43 +0100
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 11:31:04PM +0100, Felix wrote:
The attached patch changes the inline declaration, when used with an
identifier
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 07:13:21PM +0100, Felix wrote:
I'm trying to figure out how this relates to inline-global.
I noticed that inline-global calls
(cut mark-variable '##compiler#inline-global 'no) for
each identifier. Shouldn't that be 'yes? And can this cause
the same kind of
From: Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] non-termination with (declare (inline
...))
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 19:26:07 +0100
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 07:13:21PM +0100, Felix wrote:
I'm trying to figure out how this relates to inline-global.
I noticed
From: Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] non-termination with (declare (inline
...))
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 21:59:30 +0100
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 09:50:21PM +0100, Felix wrote:
My other question remains: couldn't
the inline-global with value 'yes cause
From: John Cowan co...@mercury.ccil.org
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] non-termination with (declare (inline
...))
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 18:41:10 -0400
Felix scripsit:
This leaves the decision to inline to the compiler
Excellent. However, I hope that notinline forces
On Mar 18, 2013, at 11:22 AM, Felix wrote:
From: Jim Ursetto zbignie...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] non-termination with (declare (inline
...))
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 10:57:49 -0500
Is that just for declare or does it also apply to define-inline?
No, define-inline
Felix scripsit:
This leaves the decision to inline to the compiler
Excellent. However, I hope that notinline forces the compiler never
to inline, for the reasons I gave before. Is that now the case?
--
John Cowan co...@ccil.org http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Awk! sed Grep. A fscking
