Hi folks,
Here's a patch that creates the "chicken.load" module per the roadmap.
It's mostly just reorganising code in eval.scm and doesn't yet hide
`load` or `eval` from their respective modules, but it's a step. I tried
to find a way to move things around that kept the diff reasonably small.
Pl
On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 07:33:23PM +1200, Evan Hanson wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Here's a patch that creates the "chicken.load" module per the roadmap.
>
> It's mostly just reorganising code in eval.scm and doesn't yet hide
> `load` or `eval` from their respective modules, but it's a step. I tried
>
Hi Peter,
On 2017-05-04 22:10, Peter Bex wrote:
> Nice, I've pushed this. I noticed that we still have "eval-handler",
> which wasn't in core-libraries-reorg AFAIK. I guess we need to keep
> that, and the only place that makes any sense for this would be in a
> "chicken.eval" module.
>
> If we
On 2017-05-06 11:03, Evan Hanson wrote:
> The procedure will probably be useful for some
Actually, will it? I'm having a hard time thinking of a good use case
for this, from a user's perspective. Can you think of one?
Evan
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
On Sat, May 06, 2017 at 11:48:23AM +1200, Evan Hanson wrote:
> On 2017-05-06 11:03, Evan Hanson wrote:
> > The procedure will probably be useful for some
>
> Actually, will it? I'm having a hard time thinking of a good use case
> for this, from a user's perspective. Can you think of one?
Not real
