> On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 12:39:07PM +0200, felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote:
> > No, you're quite right, but since there is not much variance (with regard
> > to tools) there, I considered it unnecessary. But we can do it your way,
> > if you prefer.
>
> I think it's a bit simpler/less
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 12:39:07PM +0200, felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote:
> No, you're quite right, but since there is not much variance (with regard
> to tools) there, I considered it unnecessary. But we can do it your way,
> if you prefer.
I think it's a bit simpler/less confusing this way.
> This looks alright, but I still have a question: why not use the install
> command on Windows too? That should allow us to get rid of the platform
> case and simplify install-executable-command and install-file-command so
> it doesn't even need to accept the platform.
>
>[...]
>
> Maybe I'm
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 01:40:26PM +0200, felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote:
> This patch reuses parameters for default.make for the name of the
> installation program to be used for egg installation, including options.
This looks alright, but I still have a question: why not use the install
This patch reuses parameters for default.make for the name of the
installation program to be used for egg installation, including options.
felix
From e7b25a1fff103cc876f8abf36e2d8064012d9e9a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: felix
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 13:34:42 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Use
