Hello!
After thinking about this, it seems to be that the "compound literal" approach
is the best one. What this means is that CPS-calls are changed in such a
manner, that arguments are passed rthrough a pointer to a C_word-array (so it
doesn't have to do anything with compound literals, that w
> > - There is no need for "rest-arg wrappers", functions that extract the rest
> > argument and then call the actual compiled C function. This can be done
> > directly from the argvector.
>
> This is cool, but if I understand correctly it also means that all the
> C_fast_retrieve_proc(lf[123]
>
> > On Jul 10, 2015, at 13:23, felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote:
> >
> > The problem with other approaches (own implementation of varargs, using
> > assembly for forcing some sort of generic call, etc.) is that they are
> > provisional hacks and take at least as much time to implement as
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 12:23:36PM +0200, felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote:
> Hello!
>
> After thinking about this, it seems to be that the "compound literal"
> approach
> is the best one. What this means is that CPS-calls are changed in such a
> manner, that arguments are passed rthrough a po
> On Jul 10, 2015, at 13:23, felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote:
>
> The problem with other approaches (own implementation of varargs, using
> assembly for forcing some sort of generic call, etc.) is that they are
> provisional hacks and take at least as much time to implement as the cleaner
