Felix fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org writes:
I think that's a good idea. You could also add the doto operator
from the miscmacros there, since I don't think it fits well into
the set of macros provided by miscmacros.
Alright, it's done, meet
From: Moritz Heidkamp mor...@twoticketsplease.de
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] Thrush operator
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 17:18:11 +0100
Moritz Heidkamp mor...@twoticketsplease.de writes:
find attached a suggested addition to miscmacros
Attached a syntax-rules based implementation which
Moritz Heidkamp mor...@twoticketsplease.de writes:
find attached a suggested addition to miscmacros
Attached a syntax-rules based implementation which is much easier to
grok. I am leaning towards putting those into a separate egg now though.
Index: miscmacros.scm
On Feb 15 2012, Moritz Heidkamp wrote:
Hi Jörg,
Jörg F. Wittenberger joerg.wittenber...@softeyes.net writes:
I rather loved to think instead of inserting the (*single*)
value of the expression into the next expression of something
along the lines of physical wires:
connect (pass) all the
Hello Chickeneers,
find attached a suggested addition to miscmacros: the thrush operator
family. Apparently it stems from Raymond Smullyan's book on
combinatorial logic To Mock a Mockingbird, which I haven't read
(yet). I've first learned about it through Clojure and have found it
quite nice for
On Feb 14 2012, Moritz Heidkamp wrote:
Hello Chickeneers,
find attached a suggested addition to miscmacros: the thrush operator
family. Apparently it stems from Raymond Smullyan's book on
combinatorial logic To Mock a Mockingbird, which I haven't read
(yet). I've first learned about it through
On 02/14/12 at 10:35pm, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
I rather loved to think instead of inserting the (*single*)
value of the expression into the next expression of something
along the lines of physical wires:
A classic, along those lines: http://dkeenan.com/Lambda/
Cheers,
Evan
Hi Jörg,
Jörg F. Wittenberger joerg.wittenber...@softeyes.net writes:
I rather loved to think instead of inserting the (*single*)
value of the expression into the next expression of something
along the lines of physical wires:
connect (pass) all the result(s) of the first expression into the
