I've backported and/or applied these to my tree, with the exception of these so
far:
# c2ea63b (uint64 fix) depends on 09bfacd1 (Windows 64 bit patch)
c2ea63b340995b1882d9ed400db0019c1686aa11
# 67ca64e (clang warnings) depends on 09bf6acd1 (Windows 64 bit patch)
Jim Ursetto zbignie...@gmail.com writes:
[ ... a lot ... ]
I just wanted to thank you guys for going through this hassle, it's
really appreciated. I will try to help in the next stabililty cycle!
Moritz
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
The ones that depend on the Win 64 bit patch could be rewritten to apply
without it,
but it's a little hairy. Can someone vouch for the patch? Otherwise I will
probably defer those changes.
I suggest to defer it.
The patch depending on flymake/elisp could have the latter added with no
From: Christian Kellermann ck...@pestilenz.org
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] Updating stability...
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2013 14:16:15 +0100
* Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl [130106 14:06]:
Hi all,
It'd be nice if we can make a stability release. I propose to merge the
attached list
From: Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] Updating stability...
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2013 19:27:52 +0100
On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 09:23:04AM -0800, Kon Lovett wrote:
This suggestion straddles the line between bug fix feature addition. The
recursive data structures were
Hi all,
It'd be nice if we can make a stability release. I propose to merge the
attached list of changesets. IMO it's reasonably conservative, I avoided
adding large non-bugfix changes.
Cheers,
Peter
--
http://sjamaan.ath.cx
commit c2ea63b340995b1882d9ed400db0019c1686aa11
Author: felix
On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 02:16:15PM +0100, Christian Kellermann wrote:
* Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl [130106 14:06]:
Hi all,
It'd be nice if we can make a stability release. I propose to merge the
attached list of changesets. IMO it's reasonably conservative, I avoided
adding large
