Re: [Chicken-hackers] numbers stuff

2015-05-18 Thread Peter Bex
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 12:39:36PM +0200, felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote: > Hi, Peter! > > > I pushed a small change to numbers-integration-scratchspace, please > take a look. During build, the scrutinizer produced a warning, due > to the use of "fp=" in "XXX-time->seconds". I changed this to

Re: [Chicken-hackers] numbers stuff

2015-05-22 Thread Peter Bex
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 12:49:09PM +0200, Peter Bex wrote: > On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 12:39:36PM +0200, felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote: > > Another question: should "C_num_to_long" and "C_num_to_unsigned_long" > > handle bignums? The same goes for "C_i_foreign_integer..." and > > friends? > > hm

Re: [Chicken-hackers] numbers stuff

2015-05-26 Thread Peter Bex
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 03:16:26PM +0200, felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote: > > On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 12:49:09PM +0200, Peter Bex wrote: > > > > I just pushed this, along with some tests, which exposed a few more bugs > > which I also fixed: I had forgotten to update the size calculations for >

Re: [Chicken-hackers] numbers stuff

2015-05-31 Thread Peter Bex
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 10:57:15PM +0200, Peter Bex wrote: > Your mail wasn't CC'ed to the mailing list, so this mail will serve as > the final opportunity for people to voice any objections against adding > full numeric tower support. If nobody objects, I will merge it somewhere > during the week

Re: [Chicken-hackers] numbers stuff

2015-05-31 Thread Arthur Maciel
\o/ Thanks for the great work, Peter!! Kind regards, Arthur 2015-05-31 10:39 GMT-03:00 Peter Bex : > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 10:57:15PM +0200, Peter Bex wrote: > > Your mail wasn't CC'ed to the mailing list, so this mail will serve as > > the final opportunity for people to voice any objections