On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 12:04:19PM +0100, Christian Kellermann wrote:
> I have attached a patch to fix the specialisation for the C_u_i_fpintegerp.
>
> BUT while this patch looks ok, it segfaults for me when doing the library
> tests.
> Could it be that the type guessing here is wrong in a partic
* Christian Kellermann [120316 09:53]:
> * felix winkelmann [120316 08:33]:
> > >> > - [PATCH] Bugfix for #791 and unpack flonums correctly for integer?
> > >>
> > >> Can't remember.
> > >
> > > http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/chicken-hackers/2012-03/msg00010.html
> > >
> >
> > Signed of
* felix winkelmann [120316 08:34]:
> From: Christian Kellermann
> Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] pending patches
> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 16:04:29 +0100
>
> > * felix winkelmann [120312
> > 12:53]:
> >> > - [PATCH] Raise error on construction of too larg
* felix winkelmann [120316 08:33]:
> >> > - [PATCH] Bugfix for #791 and unpack flonums correctly for integer?
> >>
> >> Can't remember.
> >
> > http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/chicken-hackers/2012-03/msg00010.html
> >
>
> Signed off and pushed.
This patch breaks the tests for me. This is
From: Christian Kellermann
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] pending patches
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 16:04:29 +0100
> * felix winkelmann [120312 12:53]:
>> > - [PATCH] Raise error on construction of too large vectors/blobs
>> >(this is a long thread with multiple patc
>
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:50:56PM +0100, Felix wrote:
>> >
>> > - [PATCH] fix special cases for vector/list-ref in scrutinizer when
>> > argument count is wrong
>> >(here there's a reply with a modified patch)
>>
>> Hm. Can't find that one.
>
> original mail:
> http://lists.nongnu.org
* felix winkelmann [120312 12:53]:
> > - [PATCH] Raise error on construction of too large vectors/blobs
> >(this is a long thread with multiple patches)
>
> I have to review this, since it seems to duplicate ##sys#check-range.
Oh, that has been your concern? I have completely misinterpreted
>> Hm. Can't find that one.
>
> original mail:
> http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/chicken-hackers/2012-02/msg00050.html
>
> I replied to that twice, but nongnu has issues displaying the thread
> properly. So here's the link of my second reply directly:
> http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/
Here's a couple of links to the archive.
Luckily, nongnu doesn't scrub attachments :)
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:50:56PM +0100, Felix wrote:
> >
> > - [PATCH] fix special cases for vector/list-ref in scrutinizer when
> > argument count is wrong
> >(here there's a reply with a modified patch
From: Peter Bex
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] pending patches
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 10:13:29 +0100
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 08:25:45AM +0100, Felix wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> Too many patches are floating in limbo in the moment (and I'm aware of
>> being unable to ca
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 08:25:45AM +0100, Felix wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Too many patches are floating in limbo in the moment (and I'm aware of
> being unable to catch up, particularly in the case of the more involved
> patches which I really like to review before they go into "master").
There are no rea
Hi!
Too many patches are floating in limbo in the moment (and I'm aware of
being unable to catch up, particularly in the case of the more involved
patches which I really like to review before they go into "master").
A suggestion: if a patch remains pending for a longer period, it might
be sensibl
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 01:51:47PM +0100, Felix wrote:
> > I have tried to devote some attention to this one and found that I
> > am still no good at modifying Chicken and then successfully running
> > the result. I do have some comments on the patch, which I had hoped
> > to provide as a patch, b
> I have tried to devote some attention to this one and found that I
> am still no good at modifying Chicken and then successfully running
> the result. I do have some comments on the patch, which I had hoped
> to provide as a patch, but since I seem unable to do that, I will
> provide them more i
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 02:29:59PM +0100, Christian Kellermann wrote:
> > http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/chicken-hackers/2011-11/msg00010.html
>
> This I will need a little more time, if someone likes to take over
> (or work in parallel) she is more than welcome to. This is also a critical
From: Christian Kellermann
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] pending patches
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 14:29:59 +0100
> Hi!
>
> * felix winkelmann [11 14:10]:
>> Note that the following patches are still pending for review:
>>
>> http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/h
Hi!
* felix winkelmann [11 14:10]:
> Note that the following patches are still pending for review:
>
> http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/chicken-hackers/2011-11/msg9.html
I must have overslept pushing that one after our little exchange, will push
this one next.
> http://lists.nongn
Hello!
Note that the following patches are still pending for review:
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/chicken-hackers/2011-11/msg9.html
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/chicken-hackers/2011-11/msg00010.html
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/chicken-hackers/2011-11/msg00016.html
ht
18 matches
Mail list logo
