> On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 12:11:31PM +0200, felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote:
> > > Yeah, like I said in my other message, we could use the name
> > > current-process-milliseconds, like Racket;
> > > https://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/time.html
> > >
> > > I like the name, because it's pretty
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 12:11:31PM +0200, felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote:
> > Yeah, like I said in my other message, we could use the name
> > current-process-milliseconds, like Racket;
> > https://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/time.html
> >
> > I like the name, because it's pretty clear what