[PATCH] Deprecate current-milliseconds in favor of current-process-milliseconds and improve behaviour a bit [was: Re: Exposing subsecond precision in current-seconds]

2020-05-06 Thread felix . winkelmann
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 12:11:31PM +0200, felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote: > > > Yeah, like I said in my other message, we could use the name > > > current-process-milliseconds, like Racket; > > > https://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/time.html > > > > > > I like the name, because it's pretty

[PATCH] Deprecate current-milliseconds in favor of current-process-milliseconds and improve behaviour a bit [was: Re: Exposing subsecond precision in current-seconds]

2020-05-03 Thread Peter Bex
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 12:11:31PM +0200, felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote: > > Yeah, like I said in my other message, we could use the name > > current-process-milliseconds, like Racket; > > https://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/time.html > > > > I like the name, because it's pretty clear what