Hello Doug and CHICKEN hackers,
Thanks for the benchmarking program. Somehow your e-mail is a bit
garbled, hence the top-posting, for which I apologize.
The benchmark in question deals mostly with small-sized bignums, which
means we're not even trigger the fancier division algorithms. This is
a
On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 02:42:38PM +0200, Peter Bex wrote:
> Attached are two patches, one which has this bigger improvement, and
> another which is a minor improvement which translates to shaving about
> a second of runtime off your program (at least on my machine).
The minor patch was incorrect.
> On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 02:42:38PM +0200, Peter Bex wrote:
> > Attached are two patches, one which has this bigger improvement, and
> > another which is a minor improvement which translates to shaving about
> > a second of runtime off your program (at least on my machine).
>
> The minor patch was
With patch 0001 the elapsed time went from 33.7 seconds to 24.5 seconds.
With patch 0002 the elapsed time went to 23.4 seconds.
Good work -- Doug
On Wednesday, May 22, 2024 at 08:54:49 AM MDT, Peter Bex
wrote:
On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 02:42:38PM +0200, Peter Bex wrote:
> Attached are two
