Am 05.10.2005, 14:21 Uhr, schrieb Thomas Chust [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...]
a preliminary version of my OpenSSL SSL/TLS library bindings for chicken
is available at
http://www.chust.org/projects/openssl.egg
[...]
Documentation for the full interface as it will be (in a few days or so)
At Mon, 03 Oct 2005 18:53:43 -,
Thomas Chust wrote:
I would think more how to improve ajax.scm.
Basically, support of script-enabled(?) paremeters
and evalScripts=yes would be nice.
Cool, looks more than promising!
Thanks.
Here is my idea of a patch to ajax.scm, not tested.
There
At Thu, 06 Oct 2005 14:50:18 +0900, Daishi Kato wrote:
That is certainly understandable, except that I do not know if
type-checking in scheme code is really slower than type-cheking
in c code, if the scheme code is compiled properly or unsafely. (or inlined?)
# Basically, there should not be
The syntax-case Egg available at
http://www.call-with-current-continuation.org/eggs/index.html#lang-exts
says its license is Unknown. However, the web entry
http://www.call-with-current-continuation.org/eggs/syntax-case.html has
an essentially MIT license at the bottom of it.
Cheers,
Hi again,
My interest is to get numbers egg fairly efficient
with only fixnum and flonum arithmetic, compare to without the egg.
Thanks to Alex, we know the overhead of (+) is not that bad.
(It might be possible to improve it, though.)
(expt) however is slow for fixnum arithmetic.
I reviewed the
On 10/6/05, John Lenz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was just running the SWIG chicken test suite to see if it still ran,
since we are planning on releasing a new version of SWIG. I am getting a
very strange error. Well, the error itself isn't that strange. But
adding a blank line with a
On 10/5/05, Thomas Chust [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am 04.10.2005, 20:46 Uhr, schrieb Peter Keller [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...]
What if the messages that a message passing system used were themselves
continuations? Chicken already compiles to continuation passing style,
so what would it mean
