On Monday, 24 de April de 2006 22:12, Shawn Rutledge wrote:
> A side project is how to get rid of the parentheses so that ordinary
> people can tolerate writing Scheme.
Getting rid of parenthesis is dangerous, people may forget that while writting
Scheme programs you are doing it as Scheme data an
Pupeno wrote:
On Monday, 24 de April de 2006 22:12, Shawn Rutledge wrote:
A side project is how to get rid of the parentheses so that ordinary
people can tolerate writing Scheme.
Getting rid of parenthesis is dangerous, people may forget that while writting
Scheme progra
Hi,
Trying to install sxml-match;
% chicken-setup sxml-match
The extension sxml-match does not exist.
Do you want to download it ? (yes/no/abort) [yes]
downloading catalog ...
downloading catalog from www.call-with-current-continuation.org ...
Error: Broken dependencies: extension does not exist
[Resent after my most hadn't appeared in over 12 hours]
Sorry if its been mentioned in this thread already (I haven't seen it)
but speaking of Ed Watkeys, he's been working on a scheme-based rails
equivalent called "Magic". It's written in Scheme48, however, not
Chicken.
http://magic.xmog.com/
O
On 4/25/06, Daishi Kato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Trying to install sxml-match;
>
> % chicken-setup sxml-match
> The extension sxml-match does not exist.
> Do you want to download it ? (yes/no/abort) [yes]
> downloading catalog ...
> downloading catalog from www.call-with-current-continu
Am Montag, den 24.04.2006, 15:12 -0700 schrieb Shawn Rutledge:
> Well I see the idea of calling a web framework an OS is not new:
>
> http://blogs.zdnet.com/web2explorer/?p=166
So who was the first one? ;-)
> Somebody states the obvious, that DHTML + Javascript isn't very nice
> and wouldn't it
From: Daishi Kato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Chicken-users] sxml-match egg not installableTo: chicken-users@nongnu.orgMessage-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCIIHi,Trying to install sxml-match;% chicken-setup sxml-matchThe extension sxml-match does not exist.Do you
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, felix winkelmann wrote:
[...]
While trying to figure out deployment models for binaries, I
came up with some hack for Linux:
http://galinha.ucpel.tche.br/coop?page=Deploying%20Linux%20binaries
[...]
Hello,
the basic idea behind this mechanism is fine, but the implementat
On 4/25/06, Jörg F. Wittenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Montag, den 24.04.2006, 15:12 -0700 schrieb Shawn Rutledge:
> > Well I see the idea of calling a web framework an OS is not new:
> >
> > http://blogs.zdnet.com/web2explorer/?p=166
>
> So who was the first one? ;-)
Oh you guys started
On 4/25/06, Pupeno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday, 24 de April de 2006 22:12, Shawn Rutledge wrote:
> > A side project is how to get rid of the parentheses so that ordinary
> > people can tolerate writing Scheme.
> Getting rid of parenthesis is dangerous, people may forget that while writti
Shawn Rutledge scripsit:
> Another idea I had is if Scheme people could agree on an ideal VM
> implementation (like Java or C# has), and an efficient portable binary
> data format, then binary transport (like RMI in Java) and binary
> serialization to files would be more trustworthy.
Scheme peo
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006, Shawn Rutledge wrote:
[...] Kali seems to be one of the most complete distributed Schemes
(even continuations can travel from one machine to another, and be
executed there) so doesn't that imply that it has a portable bytecode
and portable data structures? [...]
Hello,
Felix and Reed,
Thanks and sorry for not being careful to read the document.
Daishi
At Tue, 25 Apr 2006 11:33:59 -0500,
Reed Sheridan wrote:
>
>
> From: Daishi Kato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [Chicken-users] sxml-match egg not installable
> To: chicken-users@nongnu.org
>
That's nice. I think that's the actual method used by Mozilla et al.
Thanks, Thomas!
cheers,
felix
On 4/25/06, Thomas Chust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, felix winkelmann wrote:
>
> > [...]
> > While trying to figure out deployment models for binaries, I
> > came up with some
On 4/25/06, Shawn Rutledge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Another idea I had is if Scheme people could agree on an ideal VM
> implementation (like Java or C# has), and an efficient portable binary
> data format, then binary transport (like RMI in Java) and binary
> serialization to files would be m
15 matches
Mail list logo
