John Cowan wrote:
Brandon J. Van Every scripsit:
and please also build Cygwin from scratch in an
empty directory using CCMake.
It was empty, although I use "cmake ../darcs" to access my local darcs repository
rather than using CCMake (hard to script, CCMake is).
I can
Ian Oversby wrote:
It could also be I'm using darcs incorrectly? I did darcs pull -a
:-/ When building it failed with the following error. This is the
MinGW / MSYS build.
Building C object CMakeFiles/chicken-static.dir/optimizer.obj
Building C object CMakeFiles/chicken-static.dir/support.ob
Any ideas what I'm doing wrong? I tried the example from the documentation:
(sxml-match '(e (@ (i 1)) 3 4 5)
[(e (@ (i ,d)) ,a ,b ,c) (list d a b c)]
[,otherwise #f])
and got this error:
#;5> Error: expression not valid outside of quasiquote: (unquote d)
Call history:
((lambda (
From: "Ian Oversby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Chicken-users] Finding it unclear how to use sxml-match egg
Any ideas what I'm doing wrong? I tried the example from the documentation:
(sxml-match '(e (@ (i 1)) 3 4 5)
[(e (@ (i ,d)) ,a ,b ,c) (list d a b c)]
[,otherwise #f])
and got thi
Brandon J. Van Every scripsit:
> I can't account for build behavior with plain cmake, sans ccmake.
Okay, I'm building with ccmake from now on.
> But if you just run a cmake from the command line, perhaps your paths
> run the wrong cmake?
No. My path is set up so that the Cygwin directories p
(require-extension syntax-case)
(require-extension htmlprag)
(require-extension sxml-match)
Did you (import sxml-matcher)?
Reed Sheridan
"sxml-match" or "sxml-matcher".
I used the following line:
(require-extension syntax-case)
Does import do something different to require-extension?
Ian
John Cowan wrote:
Brandon J. Van Every scripsit:
Another possibility is my Windows 2000 SP4 + Platform SDK + environment
+ paths has something useful in it that your system doesn't have. What
Windows are you using? I wonder if there are any Cygwin symlink bugs on
your system.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Aug 2, 2006, at 10:20 AM, Ian Oversby wrote:
(require-extension syntax-case)
(require-extension htmlprag)
(require-extension sxml-match)
Did you (import sxml-matcher)?
Reed Sheridan
"sxml-match" or "sxml-matcher".
I used the following line:
Brandon J. Van Every scripsit:
> If symlinks are supposed to work on your system, but don't, then I want
> to know why. If symlinks aren't supposed to work on my system, but do,
> I want to know why. Open source is about giving the right bug report to
> someone. Perhaps your method will prov
John Cowan wrote:
Brandon J. Van Every scripsit:
If symlinks are supposed to work on your system, but don't, then I want
to know why. If symlinks aren't supposed to work on my system, but do,
I want to know why. Open source is about giving the right bug report to
someone. Pe
Brandon J. Van Every scripsit:
> At present, so does mine, on my box. I'm going to refrain from
> discussing this further until I've minimized my environment. Then we'll
> know whether my MinGW tools or Platform SDK was really doing the work.
Okay, time for me to eat crow.
The cause of the c
Brandon J. Van Every scripsit:
> So now I'm rebuilding Chicken 2.3 and will
> keep it in a safe directory for Cygwin bootstrap.
I keep around Chicken 2.41 (latest release) for just that reason.
> I am going to try the "symlink to cygchicken.dll" method, because it
> would remove all special-ca
Brandon J. Van Every wrote:
Ian Oversby wrote:
It could also be I'm using darcs incorrectly? I did darcs pull -a
:-/ When building it failed with the following error. This is the
MinGW / MSYS build.
Building C object CMakeFiles/chicken-static.dir/optimizer.obj
Building C object CMakeFiles/
Now, I can reproduce the problem.
% cat dump.scm
(use s11n)
(define x (make-hash-table))
(hash-table-set! x 'aaa (make-hash-table))
(hash-table-set! x 'bbb (make-hash-table))
(with-output-to-file "dump"
(lambda ()
(serialize x)))
% cat undump.scm
(use s11n)
(define (deserialize-fallback id)
Does import do something different to require-extension?
Yeah. 'require-extension' is a pkg loader for both compiled & syntax
components. But it presents all exported variables in the global space.
Namespace pollution is a problem everywhere.
The 'syntax-case' extension for Chicken provide
The test
csc -s x.scm
csi -nbq x
is working fine with the MSVC build. Meanwhile, Cygwin and MinGW are
both broken because of a bug / misfeature of CMake 2.4.3 regarding
static vs. dynamic libraries. Seems libchicken.dll.a and libchicken.a
can't coexist. I wonder if Linux and Solaris builds h
Hi,
Although I'm not sure how soon rfc822-date->date in the rfc822 egg is
going to be implemented,
I made a similar procedure, which I found useful.
This would be chicken-specific, but does not requre SRFI-19.
How do you like it?
Daishi
P.S. Can anybody explain why it does "abs" for rem?
(def
17 matches
Mail list logo
