Hi!
Is it possible to require-extension on different extensions but each
of them having the same exported functions, for example by putting
explicitly the extension in a namespace when requiring it ?
No, you would have to use a module system (like provided by
syntax-case, for example).
Is there support for choosing a version of an extension, for example
if the new version deprecates something my application uses ?
No, this is currently not possible.
Something like this is possible, if you name the extensions carefully.
I have done something like that. I used require to
On 07/01/07, Peter Busser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 12:52:11PM +0100, Peter Bex wrote:
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 01:15:08PM -0800, Brandon J. Van Every wrote:
But the clear disadvantage is it's only applicable to Debian systems.
Still, I'll wager that nobody has a
On 11/01/07, Brandon J. Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Graham Fawcett wrote:
On 1/10/07, Peter Busser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about this: A random selected person of the group of people who
added an egg during 3 months. Or 4 months or whatever period of time.
That means that
Hi!
A snaphot of the current development version (2.514) is now
available on the chicken homepage.
This is the first tarball generated with cmake.
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
I pasted in the first example in
http://galinha.ucpel.tche.br/Embedding to try out. The define-external
is missing a closing bracket and I think it needs a (return-to-host)
at the end.
(define (bar x) (gc) (* x x))
(define-external (baz (int i)) double
(sqrt i))
(return-to-host)
I wanted to
On 1/11/07, john [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I pasted in the first example in
http://galinha.ucpel.tche.br/Embedding to try out. The define-external
is missing a closing bracket and I think it needs a (return-to-host)
at the end.
(define (bar x) (gc) (* x x))
(define-external (baz (int i)) double
Hello,
At http://chicken.wiki.br/writing%20portable%20scripts we have a
section called Writing portable scripts with env whose instructions
doesn't seem to be very portable.
At least it doesn't work on my system:
$ ./s.scm
/usr/bin/env: csi -s: No such file or directory
$ cat s.scm
#!
Hello,
I just wrote a few statistical functions and realized that under Linux
gamma and tgamma compute the logarithm of the gamma function (like lgamma)
and under MacOS X gamma and tgamma correctly compute the gamma function.
This is not really a bug in the egg itself but has to do with
I use Fink (http://fink.sourceforge.net) to access ports of many
packages to Mac OS X. Fink stores the software it installs in the /
sw tree (/sw/include, /sw/lib, etc).
Currently it appears that chicken-2.5 (in particular chicken-setup)
doesn't know about /sw as a hierarchy (fair enough)
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 01:20:50PM -0500, Stephen C. Gilardi wrote:
Questions:
[1] Is there a way to configure chicken to provide additional library
search paths (and include file search paths)?
[2] Alternatively, can chicken be made to know that on Mac OS X
(Darwin), if /sw exists,
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 03:14:08PM -0500, Stephen C. Gilardi wrote:
Thanks for the info. It appears that csc offers the options I need
-I/sw/include -L/sw/lib, but chicken (according to The User
Manual and chicken -help) doesn't. When I include these in
CHICKEN_OPTIONS, chicken
On Jan 11, 2007, at 3:39 PM, Peter Bex wrote:
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 03:14:08PM -0500, Stephen C. Gilardi wrote:
Thanks for the info. It appears that csc offers the options I need
-I/sw/include -L/sw/lib, but chicken (according to The User
Manual and chicken -help) doesn't. When I include
13 matches
Mail list logo
