I think the problem is thinking about Linux as an OS, it is just a kernel. If
we considered RedHat as different to Debian, as FreeBSD is to Plan 9, then
we'd be delighted of how compatible they are and how easy it is to port from
one to the other.
The same thing happens with Schemes, one could a
On 1/14/07, Alejandro Forero Cuervo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone have code for compressing strings using zlib, lzo or some
> other common llibrary/algorithm?
Well, a long time ago I wrote some code to compress/decompress with
zlib algorithms:
http://anonymous:@freaks-unidos.net/azul-
On 1/14/07, Robin Lee Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That made me think that doing a "wait" on the process *is* behaviour
I want, and I should do that. However, process-wait throws an error
if the process has already exited, and I can't seem to trap it. I
tried:
(condition-case (process-wait
On 1/15/07, Graham Fawcett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You can't just drop this in an egg, though; the definintion of
##sys#process-wait is not public, and your compile will fail. Add it
to posixuinx.scm in your Chicken source tree, and then rebuild and
reinstall Chicken. That's a bit extreme, I
On 1/13/07, Daishi Kato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
That was something that I could not notice either at first.
Another issue for me is that I want to declare fixnum
when all other procedures are fixnum arithmetic.
So, I wished thread-sleep-millis!
Any workaround for this? Maybe making a tiny
On 1/15/07, felix winkelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/15/07, Graham Fawcett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You can't just drop this in an egg, though; the definintion of
> ##sys#process-wait is not public, and your compile will fail. Add it
> to posixuinx.scm in your Chicken source tree, a
On 1/15/07, Graham Fawcett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
#;2> (my-process-wait 2)
Error: unbound variable: ##sys#process-wait
Oh, that was exposed recently, for the osprocess egg. I forgot about
that.
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Ch
Hi, folks!
Arto has set up the bug tracker now. Everybody with an SVN account
can now add and edit tickets at:
http://trac.callcc.org
Note: before you can assign tickets to yourself (something that you are
more than eager to do, I hope! ;-) you must go to "Settings" and register
a name.
The ti
BTW, it's fine to create tickets regarding features you'd like to see,
or eggs that you think would be nice to have. That way it might be
easier to coordinate efforts working into a specific direction and
avoiding double-work.
cheers,
felix
___
Chick
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 09:41:29PM +0100, felix winkelmann wrote:
> Hi, folks!
>
> Arto has set up the bug tracker now. Everybody with an SVN account
> can now add and edit tickets at:
>
> http://trac.callcc.org
Hurray! All hail Arto! :)
Regards,
Peter
--
http://sjamaan.ath.cx
--
"The process
Arto just informed me that anonymous access to
trac.callcc.org has now been enabled, so everybody
(even without an svn account) can now enter tickets.
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailm
This is supposed to go the chicken ML.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Daishi Kato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Jan 16, 2007 10:43 AM
Subject: Re: Re : [Chicken-users] thread-sleep! for less than a second
To: felix winkelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thanks a lot!
BTW, timeout is also us
This code:
(if (file-exists? file)
(delete-file* file))
where file is a symbolic link is giving me:
Error: (delete-file) can not delete file - Permission denied: "ltest"
Now, this system is wierd in that unlink is re-mapped, but I thought
the documentation for delete-file* was pretty cl
On 1/15/07, Robin Lee Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This code:
(if (file-exists? file)
(delete-file* file))
where file is a symbolic link is giving me:
Error: (delete-file) can not delete file - Permission denied: "ltest"
Now, this system is wierd in that unlink is re-mapped, but
On 1/16/07, Daishi Kato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
BTW, timeout is also used for thread-join!, mutex-lock! and
mutex-unlock! in srfi-18.
It'd be more consistent to have */ms procedures for these above.
Or, since timeout for these procedures including thread-sleep! can be
a time object,
introduci
On 1/16/07, felix winkelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/16/07, Daishi Kato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> BTW, timeout is also used for thread-join!, mutex-lock! and
> mutex-unlock! in srfi-18.
> It'd be more consistent to have */ms procedures for these above.
> Or, since timeout for these p
16 matches
Mail list logo
