On 1/18/07, Elliot Cuzzillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This leads me to think that some kind of name mangling in C++ prevents
callbacks from having the correct name, or something. Is calling
Scheme from C++ (as opposed to C) feasible, or should I h
Hello,
I tried to compile the qt-egg on windows. I use the MinGW that comes
with QT 4.2.2 and MSYS 1.0.10.
I had to change some things in qt.setup and qt.pro, see below. After
these changes it compiled fine. But when using it, it breaks with a
strange error:
--
#;1> (use
Daniel Sadilek wrote:
Hello,
I tried to compile the qt-egg on windows. I use the MinGW that comes
with QT 4.2.2 and MSYS 1.0.10.
Did you use CMake or ./configure to build Chicken? Did you use the same
MinGW to build Chicken as you used to build the QT egg? Just checking
the basics.
Cheer
> I tried to compile the qt-egg on windows. I use the MinGW that comes
> with QT 4.2.2 and MSYS 1.0.10.
Did you use CMake or ./configure to build Chicken? Did you use the same
MinGW to build Chicken as you used to build the QT egg? Just checking
the basics.
Hi, I used CMake to build Chicken a
Daniel Sadilek wrote:
> [...]
> I had to change some things in qt.setup and qt.pro, see below. After
> these changes it compiled fine. But when using it, it breaks with a
> strange error:
>
> --
> #;1> (use qt)
> ; loading C:\Programme\Chicken\lib\chicken\1\qt.dll ...
> Er
apparently CHICKEN tries to load the compiled DLL as source code. Maybe
it doesn't contain the correct dynamic symbols to be loaded as an egg.
Guessing into the blue I would say this is a linker problem.
Hello,
this was the right hint, thanks. The qt.dll was compiled as executable
not as shared
Daniel Sadilek wrote:
So, the build of the qt egg under windows does not work out of the
box. I would like to help with that but I am not skilled enough in
this whole qmake, egg building process to provide a fully working
patch that does not break the build on other systems :)
You have mention
On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 16:41:59 -0800 "Brandon J. Van Every" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Daniel Sadilek wrote:
> >
> > So, the build of the qt egg under windows does not work out of the
> > box. I would like to help with that but I am not skilled enough in
> > this whole qmake, egg building process