Shawn Rutledge wrote:
But you're saying I'm going to have
trouble with mouse events, right?
I'd call it gruntwork rather than trouble. Mouse events on everyone's
pet OS is a boring problem. Plenty of OpenGL windowing toolkits have
dealt with it in some way. But there's a plethora of such t
Shawn Rutledge wrote:
The end-users didn't know or care what language it was written in - it
was just a Windows .exe file that happened to put up a funky-looking
UI. :-)
If there were a nice portable (Windows, X/GTK or QT, MacOS) widget
library that isn't a hassle to use, I'd use Scheme in my
On 2/3/07, Peter Keller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 09:32:35PM -0800, Brandon J. Van Every wrote:
> Similarly, there's a type called the
> "Plant" that is great at chucking out new things, but gets bored with
> them fairly quickly.
Yeah, that'd be me :)
Me too, in ge
On 2/2/07, Brandon J. Van Every <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Some people actually use Scheme as part of their commercial business
model. But they are few and far between. Their economic results are
not easily reproduced by most people. Whereas anyone can learn C++,
Java, and C# and then go make
minh thu wrote:
Well, i've tried the opengl egg... what does it lack ?
A window. A mouse. Handling of stupid window redraw events. An OpenGL
binding isn't an OpenGL windowing toolkit. You can't actually do
anything until you've dealt with that stuff somehow. It's a boring job
that ever
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 03:42:38PM -0800, Kon Lovett wrote:
>
> (and-let*
> ([(begin (display "foo.\n") #t)]
> [(= 2 1)]
> [(begin (display "bar.\n") #t)] )
> (begin
> (display "Still here.\n")))
>
> You forgot the enclosing braces for each sub-form. ('[...]' is not
>
On Feb 3, 2007, at 2:33 PM, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
I'm trying to work from http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-2/srfi-2.html
because the Chicken site is down, and I can't make and-let* work for
me at all. I've shown two attempts below.
In the chicken source, in csi.scm, there's:
(and-let* ([(fx>=
I'm trying to work from http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-2/srfi-2.html
because the Chicken site is down, and I can't make and-let* work for
me at all. I've shown two attempts below.
In the chicken source, in csi.scm, there's:
(and-let* ([(fx>= a len)]
[o (fxmod len 16)]
[(not
I can't get to any of the useful documentation pages, like
http://chicken.wiki.br/Unit%20library
-Robin
--
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/
Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!"
Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/
minh thu wrote:
At least with the mainstream languages, there's money in them, you can
get paid for them. If you accidentally become well versed in the trivia
of C++, Java, or C#, you can make big $$ at that.
Do you mean being employed ? Or at least working for out sourced
project, not in-
I'm sending a Scheme string to a foreign (C) library as a c-string.
I also send it the address of a Scheme procedure created as
define-external--this address is sent as a c-pointer.
Later on I call a safe-foreign-lambda which will use the Scheme
function whose address I sent it as a callback, and
2007/2/2, Brandon J. Van Every <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
minh thu wrote:
> Hi Brandon,
>
> although you first start your mail with a question, what's the
> underlying intention ?
> I can't understand why there's so much discussion about 'community
> size' and 'growing' and so on... it's the same on e
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 09:32:35PM -0800, Brandon J. Van Every wrote:
> An ideal, theoretical open source business model, would spread the
> impacts of development evenly over the entire community. So that nobody
> has much work to do. Then people can rationalize, "Ok, if I contribute
> a few
13 matches
Mail list logo
