felix winkelmann scripsit:
> No, I just wanted to make sure normal (shared) compilation works.
> So please check whether, say,
>
> chicken-setup numbers
>
> works.
Yes, it does.
--
Barry gules and argent of seven and six,John Cowan
on a canton azure fifty molets of the second. [EMA
Hello,
the current CHICKEN darcs head fails to build on my PowerPC iBook
running MacOS X 10.4.8. csc -version tells me the bootstrapping compiler
is version 2.523 - macosx-unix-gnu-ppc - [ libffi dload ptables
applyhook cmake ] and the error I get during the CMake configured build
process reads as
Thomas Christian Chust wrote:
By the way, as I already mentioned some months ago, the chicken-static
and csi-static executables produced by CMake builds on MacOS X are
always completely useless, because the are not statically linked against
libchicken.a as they should be but dynamically linked ag
On 2/22/07, Thomas Christian Chust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
the current CHICKEN darcs head fails to build on my PowerPC iBook
running MacOS X 10.4.8. csc -version tells me the bootstrapping compiler
is version 2.523 - macosx-unix-gnu-ppc - [ libffi dload ptables
applyhook cmake ] and th
John, could you try the current darcs head? I have
added a user option (WITHOUT_LIBFFI).
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
OK, let me first add it to the svn repo.
url/url.scm is now this modified version.
Please modify the uri part as you like. I did not change a lot since I
was not sure if I could break the compatibility with the original uri-
procedures.
Things we will have to do are to write a doc (which should b
