On 3/8/07, Alejandro Forero Cuervo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Out of curiosity --- if an egg doesn't have a 'tags' (and 'trunk')
> directory, it is possible to modify it so that it does?
Not only possible, it is also worthwhile. :-)
You can do this by doing:
[snip]
Excellent -- thank you, A
> Out of curiosity --- if an egg doesn't have a 'tags' (and 'trunk')
> directory, it is possible to modify it so that it does?
Not only possible, it is also worthwhile. :-)
You can do this by doing:
cd $EGG
mkdir trunk tags
svn add trunk tags
for file in *; do svn mv $file trunk; done;
hi,
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 12:40:48PM +0100, felix winkelmann wrote:
> On 3/8/07, Graham Fawcett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> except that i'm getting this message while compiling hart :)
> >>
> >> Warning: declarations are ignored in interpreted code
> >> (##core#declare (quote (export ha
hi,
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 06:31:50AM -0500, Graham Fawcett wrote:
> OK, I've added (begin: ...). BTW, one of these days I plan to add a
> (define-hart-keyword) procedure so you can write application-specific
> keyword forms.
sounds great!
> I've also modified the parser and macros to accept mu
On Mar 8, 2007, at 5:28 AM, felix winkelmann wrote:
Then you have to
make those macros available at _compile-time_, or the
compiler will not see them. "(require ...)" loads code at run-time,
not at compile-time. Try "require-for-syntax".
A somewhat related question: I have some macros that a
The sqlite3 egg 1.5.6+ requires the synch egg 1.0+.
(At some point the .setup files for the eggs will be changed to state
the required versions but for now you must do it manually.)
Sorry,
Kon
Unfortunately, I couldn't figure out how to do this, and it seems I've made
it worse :-/ I added (re
2007/3/8, Alejandro Forero Cuervo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >What if the directory contains multiple eggs ?
> >I ask this because I think I'll end up with lot of eggs for the
> >gl-suite project.
> >Is it better to have, gl-display-*, gl-font, gl-math, gl-repl,
> >gl-samples, gl-etcaetera,
> >or sim
> >What if the directory contains multiple eggs ?
> >I ask this because I think I'll end up with lot of eggs for the
> >gl-suite project.
> >Is it better to have, gl-display-*, gl-font, gl-math, gl-repl,
> >gl-samples, gl-etcaetera,
> >or simply gl-suite ?
> >(If the former, Felix, prepare to have
On 3/8/07, felix winkelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you use -X , it probably prefers to use an already installed
(compiled) version. For someone installing without a preinstalled
(perhaps older) version, the source file will be prefered. To ensure
the local version is used use "-X .scm".
On 3/8/07, minh thu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What if the directory contains multiple eggs ?
I ask this because I think I'll end up with lot of eggs for the
gl-suite project.
Is it better to have, gl-display-*, gl-font, gl-math, gl-repl,
gl-samples, gl-etcaetera,
or simply gl-suite ?
(If the fo
2007/3/8, felix winkelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 3/7/07, Alejandro Forero Cuervo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> egg-post-commit should only automatically upload an egg if (1) it
> detects a change in the directory for the egg's latest release and (2)
> the egg's directory doesn't have the 'auto
On 3/8/07, Graham Fawcett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Out of curiosity --- if an egg doesn't have a 'tags' (and 'trunk')
directory, it is possible to modify it so that it does?
Yes, you can restructure your egg directory with "svn mv", for example.
cheers,
felix
___
On 3/8/07, Graham Fawcett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> except that i'm getting this message while compiling hart :)
>
> Warning: declarations are ignored in interpreted code
> (##core#declare (quote (export hart-parse hart-html-escape
hart-vector-for-each*)))
Odd; it's not happening for me he
On 3/8/07, felix winkelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/7/07, Alejandro Forero Cuervo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> egg-post-commit should only automatically upload an egg if (1) it
> detects a change in the directory for the egg's latest release and (2)
> the egg's directory doesn't have th
Hi Hans,
On 3/6/07, Hans Bulfone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 07:08:38PM -0500, Graham Fawcett wrote:
thank you for the quick update!
You're welcome!
> I ended up just adding (use hart-support) into hart.scm. This seems to
> address the problem in the interpreter and co
felix winkelmann schrieb:
> On 3/8/07, foobar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi list,
>>
>> i've tried to compile a file that uses some macros defined with
>> syntax-rules.
>> I compiled it using: csc -R tinyclos foo.scm
>> So nothing special sofar.
>> The file compiles without warnings or errors.
>
On 3/8/07, foobar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi list,
i've tried to compile a file that uses some macros defined with
syntax-rules.
I compiled it using: csc -R tinyclos foo.scm
So nothing special sofar.
The file compiles without warnings or errors.
Another file compiled to a shared-library
usin
Hi list,
i've tried to compile a file that uses some macros defined with
syntax-rules.
I compiled it using: csc -R tinyclos foo.scm
So nothing special sofar.
The file compiles without warnings or errors.
Another file compiled to a shared-library
using csc -s cps.scm.
This file requires the macros
18 matches
Mail list logo
