Works fine so far.
Thanks for your quick fix.
Daishi
On 6/6/07, Kon Lovett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jun 5, 2007, at 4:23 PM, Daishi Kato wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think it is important to distinguish the following two:
> http://1.1.1.1/abc?def
> http://1.1.1.1/abc?def=
Done. See version 3.3
On Jun 5, 2007, at 4:23 PM, Daishi Kato wrote:
Hi,
I think it is important to distinguish the following two:
http://1.1.1.1/abc?def
http://1.1.1.1/abc?def=
Done. See version 3.3
Best Wishes,
Kon
Thanks,
Daishi
___
Chicken-users mailing
Not that this solves your problem, but you can do a one-time, one-way
eggdoc->wiki transformation using the eggdoc-svnwiki egg.
(http://chicken.wiki.br/eggdoc-svnwiki, generated using itself :)
But there is no way to retain the semantic information during the conversion.
If some support were add
Hi Bryan,
if you're looking for performance you might consider gambit:
http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~gambit/
It compiles to C, has a great debugger, and you should find people on
the gambit mailing list to help you if you have questions.
You might want to take a look at termite too:
"Termite is
Hi,
I think it is important to distinguish the following two:
http://1.1.1.1/abc?def
http://1.1.1.1/abc?def=
Thanks,
Daishi
On 6/6/07, Kon Lovett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jun 5, 2007, at 9:13 AM, Kon Lovett wrote:
>
> On Jun 5, 2007, at 5:18 AM, Daishi Kato wrote:
>
>> Can be anything
Well, I suppose it is a general question. Basically I have a big
application made a few years ago, we (meaning myself and some
partners) want to start it up again and add capabilities to it, this
application was at the point in it where I know what I will want to do
will require C because will nee
On 6/5/07, John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Brandon Van Every scripsit:
> I'll repeat what I said before. If Stalin is so great, then someone
> go start a Stalin community. That's what needs to happen for it to be
> relevant.
There's not a huge development community around "ls" either.
Bryan,
I'd like to know from what perspective you are approaching this. Do
you already have code written for Stalin that you need to interface to
Chicken? Or are you interested in the optimizations Stalin does
purely as a research problem and would like to see if they are
applicable to Chicken?
Brandon Van Every scripsit:
> I'll repeat what I said before. If Stalin is so great, then someone
> go start a Stalin community. That's what needs to happen for it to be
> relevant.
There's not a huge development community around "ls" either. Some
people might say it's already over-developed.
On 6/5/07, Brandon Van Every <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/5/07, Dan Muresan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Let's stick to discussions that provide value to all participants.
That's never generally true on any mailing list. Clearly you don't
value this one.
That is to say, you don't value th
On 6/5/07, Dan Muresan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This goes far beyond games on Windows. This is about people
> completely wasting their time on projects that, if they have no
> academic context, are completely worthless. I've gone bankrupt
> chasing nonsense. I have delusions of grandeur th
I have a couple of general questions on exceptions.
1. When handling an exception I can print the call chain out but how
do I actually print the error?
2. When a new thread is started how do I signal an error in a
previously defined exception handler e.g. in the primordial thread.
So in the cod
On Jun 5, 2007, at 9:13 AM, Kon Lovett wrote:
On Jun 5, 2007, at 5:18 AM, Daishi Kato wrote:
Can be anything other than string.
Any symbol, or #t?
My preference is #t which can be overidden by an optional argument.
Ok.
Umm, not ok. Default is "". When reading it is a string, when
print
Dan Muresan scripsit:
> I think it's pretty well established that Stalin (and Gambit?) are
> faster than Chicken, but Chicken has a much better ecosystem (community,
> libraries etc).
No dispute about any of that.
> P.S. All this talk of Stalin has made me curious; is there a page
> document
Dan Muresan writes:
> > This goes far beyond games on Windows. This is about people
> > completely wasting their time on projects that, if they have no
> > academic context, are completely worthless. I've gone bankrupt
> > chasing nonsense. I have delusions of grandeur that I *might* save
>
On Jun 5, 2007, at 6:11 AM, felix winkelmann wrote:
On 6/5/07, Graham Fawcett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/5/07, Alex Queiroz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/5/07, felix winkelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 6/4/07, Mitchell Wand <[EM
Hi - I have noticed the following:
when using tinyclos if one has done (keyword-style #:prefix), which
is my preference, prior to loading tinyclos certain things in
tinyclos do not work. for instance:
#;4> (define-generic x-of)
#;4> Error: during expansion of (define-generic ...) - call o
On Jun 5, 2007, at 5:18 AM, Daishi Kato wrote:
Can be anything other than string.
Any symbol, or #t?
My preference is #t which can be overidden by an optional argument.
Ok.
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.
On Jun 5, 2007, at 6:23 AM, John Cowan wrote:
Kon Lovett scripsit:
I think a bug. Doesn't matter what the RFC says, it should have
something well defined as a value. Currently the query component must
be composed of \s=\s, but should be ok. The
should be defaulted - optional argument or par
This goes far beyond games on Windows. This is about people
completely wasting their time on projects that, if they have no
academic context, are completely worthless. I've gone bankrupt
chasing nonsense. I have delusions of grandeur that I *might* save
some young buck from his/her utter cluele
On 6/5/07, John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Brandon Van Every scripsit:
> This is infrastructurally lame. Anyone who is that enamored with
> speed deserves what they get. Efforts would be better spent actually
> creating a community around Stalin and showing some leadership
> addressing i
Brandon Van Every scripsit:
> This is infrastructurally lame. Anyone who is that enamored with
> speed deserves what they get. Efforts would be better spent actually
> creating a community around Stalin and showing some leadership
> addressing its utter inadequacies. C'mon guys, if you want to
I'm currently working on implementing HDF4 [1] support for
Chicken. Essentially, an HDF4 file is a sort of archive,
consisting of a number of (annotated) arbitrary rank arrays,
called scientific data sets (SDS) in HDF's own terminology.
While the data sets cont
On 6/4/07, John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Brandon Van Every scripsit:
> Speed, to the exclusion of all other considerations, is not the real
> world. I can understand compiling portable Scheme code under any 2
> different compilers. I cannot fathom trying to get such code to
> interopera
Hello all,
I tried to build a new chicken from the latest darcs sources today,
and I couldn't get past the configure step of CMake. The problem
seemed to be that I have no libffi, so the libffi test doesn't build,
and CMake won't let me go on and [c]onfigure.
I browsed through CMakeLists
Kon Lovett scripsit:
> I think a bug. Doesn't matter what the RFC says, it should have
> something well defined as a value. Currently the query component must
> be composed of \s=\s, but should be ok. The
> should be defaulted - optional argument or parameter otherwise?
RFC 3986 in fact a
On 6/5/07, Graham Fawcett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/5/07, Alex Queiroz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/5/07, felix winkelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 6/4/07, Mitchell Wand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > We are sorry to report that Will Clinger has resigned from the Editors
> >
On 6/5/07, Alex Queiroz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/5/07, felix winkelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/4/07, Mitchell Wand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We are sorry to report that Will Clinger has resigned from the Editors
> > Committee, effective on May 21, 2007. We accept his resi
Hallo,
On 6/5/07, felix winkelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/4/07, Mitchell Wand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We are sorry to report that Will Clinger has resigned from the Editors
> Committee, effective on May 21, 2007. We accept his resignation with regret
> and thank him for his servic
Can be anything other than string.
Any symbol, or #t?
My preference is #t which can be overidden by an optional argument.
On 6/5/07, Kon Lovett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jun 5, 2007, at 1:10 AM, Daishi Kato wrote:
> Hi Kon,
>
> Finally, I'm start using the new uri egg,
> which leads to me
Tue, 05 Jun 2007 13:06:29 +0300, danmbox wrote:
> > BTW, has anyone gotten stalin to work lately? I ran my 512mb Athlon
> > for the whole night and was not able to compile stalin 0.11 (gcc 4.1.2).
>
> Same here with a 768 MB box. The machine tries to compile stalin.c but
> mostly trashes the swap
On 6/5/07, felix winkelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/5/07, John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brandon Van Every scripsit:
> > Speed, to the exclusion of all other considerations, is not the real
> > world. I can understand compiling portable Scheme code under any 2
> > different com
BTW, has anyone gotten stalin to work lately? I ran my 512mb Athlon
for the whole night and was not able to compile stalin 0.11 (gcc 4.1.2).
Same here with a 768 MB box. The machine tries to compile stalin.c but
mostly trashes the swap space (strangely, since it's just a -O2
compilation). I w
On Jun 5, 2007, at 1:10 AM, Daishi Kato wrote:
Hi Kon,
Finally, I'm start using the new uri egg,
which leads to me a new problem.
Here is the log. Is it a bug, or not?
I think a bug. Doesn't matter what the RFC says, it should have
something well defined as a value. Currently the query co
On 6/5/07, Lev Shamardin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have successfully compiled the runtime system for a Dragonfire 68k-based
> system before (but didn't get it to run yet), so perhaps this is a gcc bug.
How did you manage to do that?
Using an in-house toolchain based on gcc 3.4.3, I think
Umm, I might see my 60th birthday before packaging is core Scheme. (I
don't think there should be anything else, except "optional.")
You forgot to mention your current age :)
Well, 'require-extension' is an accepted SRFI. And Chicken does support
'require' (I use it in the bloom-filter egg, ho
On Jun 5, 2007, at 1:37 AM, Sunnan wrote:
Kon Lovett wrote:
What I miss most from R5RS is the user-visible way to include and/
or define libraries. Today I use chicken and write (require-
extension extension-names ...) but I'd love for this to be the same
across most Schemes.
Umm, I mi
Kon Lovett wrote:
If I may be so bold, it seems the greatest issue is the "library"
arena. Drop it. Define a core only. There is so many similar
extensions of R5RS in std use that an agreeable R6RS would not be a
rewrite of R5RS. (BTW, I think the full numeric tower & extended
characters/str
On Jun 4, 2007, at 11:49 PM, felix winkelmann wrote:
On 6/4/07, Mitchell Wand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We are sorry to report that Will Clinger has resigned from the
Editors
Committee, effective on May 21, 2007. We accept his resignation
with regret
and thank him for his service.
Accor
Hi Kon,
Finally, I'm start using the new uri egg,
which leads to me a new problem.
Here is the log. Is it a bug, or not?
--daishi
Version 2.613 - linux-unix-gnu-x86 - [ dload ptables applyhook cmake ]
(c)2000-2007 Felix L. Winkelmann
#;1> (use uri)
; loading /usr/local/chicken-2.613/lib/chicken
Hi,
felix winkelmann wrote:
> Note that this is incorrect: the first (68k-native) chicken should be
> built without
> the TARGET_... variables. Not that this will change anything with the
> actual compilation problem, though...
Native compilation yields exactly the same error in exactly the same
41 matches
Mail list logo
