On 7/21/07, Brandon Van Every <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Making a wiki users add some numbers before they commit an edit was
instituted as an anti-spam measure. Did it work? I ask because the
CMake authors recently adopted a draconian restriction on their bug
tracker, that only the reporter and
On 7/21/07, Robin Lee Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have an app that uses a couple of C libraries. The general
problem I'm trying to solve is providing status updates to the user
in a timely fashion (ideally, about 750ms).
I've tried two approaches, both of which have failed:
1. set-si
felix winkelmann wrote:
> On 7/21/07, Robin Lee Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I have an app that uses a couple of C libraries. The general
>> problem I'm trying to solve is providing status updates to the user
>> in a timely fashion (ideally, about 750ms).
>> [...]
> [...]
> I can't thin
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 01:39:10PM +0200, felix winkelmann wrote:
> On 7/21/07, Robin Lee Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >2. A grotesque hack using foreign code and setitimer and such.
> >You can find this hack at http://paste.lisp.org/display/44881.
> >The problem here is that if the interru
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 03:54:26PM +0200, Thomas Christian Chust wrote:
> felix winkelmann wrote:
>
> > On 7/21/07, Robin Lee Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> I have an app that uses a couple of C libraries. The general
> >> problem I'm trying to solve is providing status updates to the
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 06:54:29PM -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> 2. A grotesque hack using foreign code and setitimer and such.
> You can find this hack at http://paste.lisp.org/display/44881.
> The problem here is that if the interrupt kicks off when the
> program is busy, the whole program ha
On 7/22/07, Thomas Christian Chust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Unfortunately, CHICKEN apparently doesn't support subsecond resolution
for file-select.
Indeed. Must fix that.
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
htt
Robin Lee Powell scripsit:
> > uh oh - running Scheme callbacks in interrupt handlers is
> > dangerous: the set of libc functions that may be called inside
> > them is restricted, and this is likely to highly risky.
>
> Can you expand on this a bit?
It's a C restriction, not a Chicken one. Basi
