I need to parse some RFC 1123 dates, in order to turn them into something on which it is
easier to perform arithmetic (RFC 1123 is the format used, among other things, to
describe absolute dates/times in HTTP). I would very much like to avoid writing a whole
crazy thing to do this from scratch
Hello,
I was wondering if it would be possible to make some
reorganization to the sections in the Eggs Unlimited page, since now
the 'Miscellaneous' section seems to have become the largest
one. Specifically, I have the following changes in mind:
1. Rename section `Run-time code generation'
Kon,
My apologies, I missed that in the doc. I'll open a TRAC ticket.
Thanks,
Joshua
On 7/30/07, Kon Lovett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Jul 30, 2007, at 10:23 AM, Joshua Griffith wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm trying to use format to create a string consisting of the cars
> > of a lis
On Jul 30, 2007, at 10:23 AM, Joshua Griffith wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to use format to create a string consisting of the cars
of a list of lists delimited by commas and enclosed by
parentheses. I tried the following statement:
(format #f "(~:{~a~:^, ~})" '((prop1 val1) (prop2 val2) (pro
Hello,
I'm trying to use format to create a string consisting of the cars of
a list of lists delimited by commas and enclosed by parentheses. I
tried the following statement:
(format #f "(~:{~a~:^, ~})" '((prop1 val1) (prop2 val2) (prop3 val3)))
But it returns:
"(prop1, prop2, prop3, )"
H
On 7/29/07, Ivan Raikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>I have further improved the wiki->texi converter, to the point
> where it is able to produce a usable Chicken manual in Texinfo
> format. I have created a ticket on trac.calcc.org that includes a
> texinfo-related patch to stream
On 7/30/07, Shawn Rutledge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/29/07, felix winkelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The backtrace is misleading: what fails is the "(pp ... o)" on a closed
> > port (closed by evaluating the "(exit)"). This should actually show up
> > in the error message. Do you run
On 7/29/07, felix winkelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The backtrace is misleading: what fails is the "(pp ... o)" on a closed
> port (closed by evaluating the "(exit)"). This should actually show up
> in the error message. Do you run this test in the interpreter or do you
> compile it?
Quite r
